'You Are Acting Inappropriately': 2nd Circuit Scolds Lawyer Before Kicking Him Out
In an interview hours after the hearing, New York lawyer Todd Bank said he could have been more cordial, but he didn't regret his comments in court.
December 12, 2019 at 10:54 AM
5 minute read
A New York lawyer said he has no regrets about being escorted by security from a federal appeals hearing Wednesday, after a judge on the panel admonished him for "discourteous" and "inappropriate" behavior.
The astonishing audio of the hearing in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit quickly made the rounds on social media, where appellate lawyers appeared stunned—and captivated—by the rare turn of events and shared their own observations of court hearings that, to be sure, did not go as planned.
The hearing started with solo attorney Todd Bank telling the appellate panel he had nothing new to add beyond what he wrote in his briefs. He said he assumed the panel was familiar with the record, and he asked whether anyone had questions for him.
The case before Judges Denny Chin, Barrington Parker and Robert Sack involved an attorney's challenge to a local rule for the Eastern District of New York bar that requires applicants to get a sponsoring affidavit from another attorney that outlines what they know about the applicant's character and legal experience.
Chin asked about the alleged harm to the lawyer challenging the affidavit, drawing an assertion from Bank that the judge's remarks had "nothing to do with this case." The hearing quickly went downhill for Bank after Chin pressed the lawyer to articulate what the alleged injury was—essentially, why he's in court in the first place.
"Are you serious judge? With all due respect, I don't know what to say," Bank said.
Chin responded: "You know what, I withdraw my question. You can sit down."
"OK, well, thank you. Thank you very much judge. I see that you read the briefs thoroughly," Bank said.
Chin asserted: "Listen, you know, you are acting inappropriately—you are acting inappropriately. Well, well, you are acting in a disrespectful and discourteous manner, and that's not appropriate."
The judges then turned to Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew Modafferi, who rested on the arguments in the briefs. The hearing appeared to be ending just minutes after it started.
But Bank said he wanted rebuttal time. The Second Circuit panel wasn't having it, and Chin and a second judge told Bank he had "waived" rebuttal and was excused. Parker then asked that Bank be removed from the court, and he was again told to leave.
Listen to the audio of the hearing here:
In an interview hours after the hearing, Bank said he could have been more cordial, but he didn't regret his comments to Chin.
"Judge Chin's point—it certainly indicates he didn't know what the case was about," Bank said. "Ninety percent of the case was what [my client] objected to, rightly or wrongly: The steps he would have to go through to even get the affidavit."
Bank graduated from Brooklyn Law School and was admitted to the New York bar in 1997. Bank has gotten some press attention over the years as New York's "annoyance" lawyer, stemming from his focus on pursuing Telephone Consumer Protection Act litigation and other claims.
Bank said he's never been removed from a court before during his nearly 20 years of practice. He said he generally appears at the Second Circuit to argue two to three times a year.
Both sides were given 10 minutes for oral arguments Wednesday, but the hearing lasted about 3 minutes and 30 seconds.
" It's certainly not something I was planning ahead of time," Bank said in the interview. "I think I was understandably very frustrated—when the opening comment from the bench clearly shows, at least from where I was standing, figuratively speaking, that at least one judge didn't know what the case was about or didn't care. … I assume he didn't know."
Chin, who has served on the Second Circuit since 2010, was not immediately reached for comment Thursday morning.
Bank said he spoke with security as he left the courthouse, who told him he was not in trouble or under arrest. He said he doesn't expect any sort of discipline to follow the episode.
"I'm not aware of any law I broke. They kicked me out of the courtroom. I left," Bank said. "Whether they had a right, I'm not sure. I wasn't being a continuing threat."
Read more:
How to Tell a Supreme Court Justice They're Wrong
Trump Can't Block NY Subpoena for Tax Records, 2nd Circuit Rules
Sarah Palin's Defamation Suit Against NYT Is Revived by 2nd Circuit
Judge Weinstein Says Year Rule in Local Fed Bar Sponsorship 'Appears Unnecessary'
White House Reaches Out to Asian-American Leaders About Supreme Court Seat
Mike Scarcella contributed reporting.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllStanding Spat: Split 2nd Circuit Lets Challenge to Pfizer Diversity Program Proceed
Legal Issues to Watch in the US Appeals Courts in 2025
Trending Stories
- 1South Florida Attorney Charged With Aggravated Battery After Incident in Prime Rib Line
- 2'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 3Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 4‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 5State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250