Analysis

Six Things Applicants Need To Know About NY’s Character and Fitness Process

This article discusses a few key pointers that may help candidates navigate this stressful, and sometimes confusing, process.

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
checklistLate last month, thousands of anxious candidates from around the world learned whether they passed the July 2019 New York Bar Exam. Now that this step of the process is behind them, a more significant hurdle stands between them and admission to the New York bar: the character and fitness process. The stated mission of the Character and Fitness Committees in the four Appellate Division Departments is to determine whether the applicant possesses the “character and general fitness requisite for an attorney and counsellor-at-law.” See N.Y. Jud. L. §90(1)(a); see also 22 N.Y.C.R.R. §520.12(a). For many candidates, the process will be fairly straightforward. Other candidates, however, may encounter a variety of complications, possibly owing to an unfortunate incident in their past or difficulty obtaining the required documentation to submit to the Committee. This article discusses a few key pointers that may help candidates navigate this stressful, and sometimes confusing, process.

(1) Read the rules and plan ahead. Unlike other states, New York maintains four independent Committees that assess a potential lawyer’s character and fitness—one Committee for each of the four Appellate Division departments. This is important for two reasons. First, candidates must make sure they are filing their application in the right judicial department—namely the department where the New York Board of Law Examiners has certified the candidate. While this may seem obvious, we have regularly seen candidates’ applications delayed because they filed in the wrong department (especially candidates who filed their application from outside New York but subsequently moved to the state). Second, the rules in the four departments are slightly different. For instance, in the First and Second Departments, candidates are not allowed to submit their application materials until: (1) they have been certified to that Appellate Division’s Character and Fitness Committee and (2) they have been notified that they passed the bar. By contrast, in the Third and Fourth Departments, candidates are encouraged to submit their materials early and need not wait for their bar results. The Committees also have slightly different processes for conducting character and fitness interviews and hearings. Candidates would be wise to consult the rules for the respective committees, which can be found on the Appellate Division Department websites. Failure to follow these rules could delay the candidate’s application.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

Law Firms Mentioned

Trending Stories

 

Featured Product

Global Briefing

A weekly, curated selection of our international content from around the globe, across the business of law, in-house, regulatory, technology and more, with expert insights from our senior editors.

Learn More

Recommended Stories

The Riddle of State Actor Status for Private Foster Care Agencies

Sofya Uvaydov, Timothy Capowski and Jennifer Graw |

For the last 15 years, the courts in this Circuit have consistently split on a focused question: are private foster care agencies state actors for purpose of 42 U.S.C. §1983 liability? The district courts have the task of reconciling two Second Circuit decisions from the 1970s, finding state actor status, with 40 years of subsequent Supreme Court precedent that dictates the opposite answer.

Don’t Blame the Victim: A Potential Defense for Ransom Payers and Facilitators after OFAC’s Ransomware Sanctions Facilitation Advisory

Michael A. Kleinman and Marc Schein |

While many commentators have reacted to the Advisory by stressing the importance of implementing robust screening and compliance measures and warning companies to do their best to avoid paying ransoms, the authors of this article focus on how to mount a defense to a potential sanctions enforcement action under the Advisory when some or all of those efforts have been taken to no avail.

More from ALM

 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Privacy Policy

About Us / Contact Us / Site Map / Advertise With Us/ Customer Service / Terms of Service/ FAQ / Privacy Policy

Publications

Law Topics

Rankings

More

Law.com

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.