There is little question that the cross-examination of an expert can be both challenging and intimidating. Indeed, there are times when an expert witness has far more courtroom experience than the lawyer attempting to cross-examine him. The attorney who begins a cross without a clear purpose and without thorough preparation is headed for disaster, but with a solid plan, proper preparation, and the use of appropriate techniques, the cross of an expert can go a long way to supporting a winning summation.

There are certain time-tested trial techniques that can be used by attorneys to cross-examine an expert regardless of his field of expertise and regardless of his experience. Three effective techniques every attorney should develop and use when cross examining an expert include: controlling the witness, using the “voice of reason,” and asking low risk open-ended questions.

Tell, Don’t Ask

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]