Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
NYPD police car (Photo: Nick Allen/flickr) Photo: Nick Allen/flickr

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has ruled that a Queens detective was shielded from claims of malicious prosecution, despite his failure to inform a grand jury about problems with a witness’ identification of a suspect in the 2007 robbery of a sporting goods store.

This premium content is locked for
New York Law Journal subscribers only.

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?
Interested in customizing your subscription with Law.com All Access?
Contact our Sales Professionals at 1-855-808-4530 or send an email to groupsales@alm.com to learn more.

Tom McParland

Tom McParland of New York Law Journal can be contacted at tmcparland@alm.com. Follow him on Twitter @TMcParlandALM.

More from this author


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2019 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.