U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Courtesy photo.
The new lawsuit said the Trump administration directive “was driven by unconstitutional animus against nonwhite immigrants,” and exceeded the authority of the executive branch of the federal government.
August 27, 2019 at 11:40 AM
1 minute read
A new lawsuit filed in Manhattan Tuesday against the Trump administration’s “public charge” rule claimed the new directive “was driven by unconstitutional animus against nonwhite immigrants,” and exceeded the authority of the executive branch of the federal government.
The new challenge was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York by attorneys with the Legal Aid Society, Center for Constitutional Rights, and Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
