In a terse order Wednesday, the Appellate Division, First Department denied both a law firm plaintiff’s reargument motion and an alternative request for leave to appeal to the state’s high court, in a suit focused on claims flowing from alleged “inaccuracies and omissions” found in Matthew Bender & Co.’s New York Landlord-Tenant Law “Tanbook.”

The denial of the motion-based requests neutralizes most avenues that plaintiff law firm Himmelstein, McConnell, Gribben, Donoghue & Joseph and related plaintiffs have to pursue their breach-of-warranty and other claims lodged against Bender & Co. in 2017.