OneCoin Founders Charged With Operating Crypto Ponzi Scheme
The company claims to have 3 million "members" across the globe, who prosecutors say have invested billions of dollars in the fraudulent scheme.
March 08, 2019 at 04:32 PM
4 minute read
The head of a multibillion-dollar cryptocurrency company claiming millions of members around the world has been charged with perpetuating what was in fact a global Ponzi scheme, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York.
Konstantin Ignatov was arrested March 6 at the Los Angeles International Airport on wire fraud charges and presented in California federal court where he is being detained on the charges in Manhattan.
According to federal authorities, Ignatov; his sister, Ruja Ignatova, who founded the company, OneCoin; and others induced investors to invest in so-called OneCoin packages for a share in the digital mining of the crytocurrency. Records obtained as part of the investigation showed that, from 2014 to 2016 alone, OneCoin took in approximately $3.75 billion in sales revenue, and claimed profits of approximately $2.5 million.
Meanwhile, the value of the digital currency grew, eventually rising to be worth about $33.65 a coin in January. Prosecutors now say those prices had nothing to do with the market for the cryptocurrency and, in fact, the siblings intended to defraud investors from the inception of OneCoin.
“They promised big returns and minimal risk, but, as alleged, this business was a pyramid scheme based on smoke and mirrors more than zeroes and ones,” U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman said in a statement. “Investors were victimized while the defendants got rich.”
Throughout the alleged scheme, investigators claim the siblings made their ultimate intentions known. According to prosecutors, Ignatova described her thoughts on the pair's exit strategy from OneCoin.
“Take the money and run and blame someone else for this,” she allegedly wrote Ignatov, according to federal authorities.
OneCoin came to the United States in 2015, after Ignatova, who was then still its founder and leader, announced the opening of a stateside market for the Bulgaria-based cryptocurrency. At some point, Ignatov took over as the face for the company when his sister disappeared from public view. By 2018 buzz around OneCoin's initial coin offering, or ICO, was growing.
In reality, prosecutors claim, Ignatov was behind the scenes manually manipulating the value of the currency, while funds from investors were being routed through what were called investment funds, but what federal authorities say were meant to launder money.
Another defendant, Mark Scott, is alleged to have been party to the money laundering operation. Scott, whose LinkedIn account says he was a former Locke Lord partner, helped the company launder more than $400 million through accounts based in the Cayman Islands and Ireland, prosecutors said.
Scott was arrested in September 2018, and is currently facing related money laundering charges before U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos of the Southern District of New York.
Scott is represented in his current criminal case by solo practitioner David Garvin, who did not immediately return a request for comment.
Ignatov is being represented by a team led by Schertler & Onorato senior counsel Robert Bennett. He, too, did not respond immediately to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAmid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute read2nd Circuit Revives Connecticut Lawyers' Challenge to Anti-Discrimination Ethics Rule
Trending Stories
- 1'Entitlement to Information Has Its Limits:' Judge Denies Another Discovery Deadline Extension in Trademark Suit
- 2Big Tech and Internet Companies Slammed With Consumer Class Actions in December
- 3Fifty Years After Nixon, Progress on Amending Rule 17(c)
- 4Inhouse Launches Generative AI-Powered Legal Agent and Attorney Referral Platform
- 5Mind Your Business (Affairs)!
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250