First Department Upholds Record $6.1M Ankle Injury Jury Award
The appellate panel only narrowly trimmed Aminata Kromah's award down to $10.4 million after a Bronx jury in 2017 found property managers failed to keep stairs in their building in proper condition.
February 21, 2019 at 05:03 PM
3 minute read
A record-setting jury $6.1 million pain-and-suffering award in an ankle fracture suit was upheld by an Appellate Division, First Department panel on Thursday.
The plaintiff, Aminata Kromah, also saw her total verdict of $10.4 million upheld by the appellate panel, the largest amount sustained by the First Department outside an amputation or brain damage case, according to Kromah's trial attorney, Lipsig, Shapey, Manus & Moverman partner Marc Eli Freund.
“It's been a long fight for Mrs. Kromah,” Freund told the Law Journal, noting that the case began six years ago. The accident occurred in 2013, when Kromah, who was in her early 30s, fell down a set of stairs, doing significant damage to her ankle and legs.
The award was needed to provide her with the quality medical care she'll need going forward, Freund said, as she's without health insurance.
On appeal, the panel of Justices Dianne Renwick, Sallie Manzanet-Daniels, Jeffrey Oing, and Peter Moulton sided not only with Bronx Supreme Court Justice James Hubert Jr. on the award, but on actions during jury deliberations called into question by the appellants, Langsam Property Service.
Langsam argued it was prejudiced by Hubert's decision to recall the jury an hour into deliberations to instruct it about considering evidence toward a violation of New York City administrative law.
The panel found Hubert's decision was not prejudicial, as it was simply a reiteration of the original instructions about Langsam's duty to maintain the stairwell. Hubert, the panel noted, instructed the jury that it was a supplement, not a change or modification to the original instructions.
To the damages, Langsam argued they deviated from reasonable compensation for a plaintiff. Specifically, it objected to the award for future medical expenses because there was no evidence Kromah would need specific future, costly pain management techniques, as well as other potentially unnecessary treatments.
The panel agreed regarding one aspect of future medical care, radiofrequency sympathectomy, but declined to adjust the award based on the appellant's additional arguments.
Cozen O'Connor member Eric Berger represented Langsam on appeal. He did not respond to a request for comment.
Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco name attorney Brian Issac represented Kromah before the First Department.
The suit was Kromah v. 2265 Davidson Realty, 8381 303791/13.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Lawyers Picked (So Far) by Trump for Key Roles in His Second Administration
5 minute readNY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
The American Disabilities Act, Sovereign Immunity and Individual Liability
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250