Federal Judge Denies White House Stay of Discovery in Census Lawsuit
U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman of the Southern District of New York said Friday afternoon that discovery should go forward as scheduled, including a deposition of Acting Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights John Gore.
September 07, 2018 at 05:19 PM
4 minute read
A federal judge has denied a motion from the Trump administration to stay discovery in state Attorney General Barbara Underwood's lawsuit over a question about citizenship on the 2020 U.S. Census.
U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman of the Southern District of New York said in a decision Friday afternoon that discovery should go forward as scheduled, including a deposition of Acting Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights John Gore. That deposition is scheduled for Sept. 12.
The Trump administration moved to stay discovery on the Friday before Labor Day weekend, which Furman took note of on three separate occasions in the decision. They were seeking to pause all discovery in the case, but particularly the deposition of Gore, Furman said.
Gore's deposition could help Underwood get to the root of how the U.S. Department of Commerce decided to add a question about citizenship to the next census. Gore allegedly ghostwrote a letter from Department of Justice to Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross asking that the question be added, Furman said.
Underwood and 17 other attorneys general are suing the Trump administration for adding the question earlier this year. They claimed in their lawsuit, filed in April, that asking about citizenship will decrease turnout for the census in states with large immigrant populations, like New York. That could cause those states to lose representatives in Congress and the Electoral College, and a smaller recorded population could also mean less federal funding in areas like education and health care, the attorneys general argued.
Furman said in a July decision that there was “strong” evidence the Trump administration acted in bad faith when deciding to add the citizenship question. That decision also advanced discovery in the case, which Underwood's office has been conducting since that time.
That's one reason Furman denied the Trump administration's motion to stay discovery on Friday. He said there clearly wasn't evidence of irreparable harm to support their motion when they waited so long to file it.
“Defendants waited nearly two full months to seek a stay of the court's ruling (and even then filed their motion at 6 p.m. on the eve of a three-day weekend)—during which time the parties conducted substantial discovery,” Furman wrote in his decision. “That delay, in itself, belies defendants' conclusory assertions of irreparable harm.”
Furman also rejected the Trump administration's argument that he used an incorrect legal standard to determine bad faith in the July decision. Furman rebutted that argument, saying the administration had actually used an incorrect standard in asserting their claim, which was slim on evidence, he said.
Furman also said in a case as time-sensitive as this one, with the census coming up in less than two years, any delay could go against the public interest.
“Given the importance of the census and the need for a timely resolution of plaintiffs' claims, staying discovery altogether will substantially injure both plaintiffs and the public interest,” Furman wrote.
Furman denied the administration's request to stay Gore's deposition separately, citing the same reasons.
“Put simply, a deposition of the person who apparently wrote the memorandum that Secretary Ross himself requested and then later relied on to justify his decision to add the citizenship question is highly relevant 'to assessing the commerce secretary's reasons,'” Furman wrote.
Underwood is leading the lawsuit along with attorneys general from Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Iowa, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Virginia, Vermont, Washington and the District of Columbia.
Kate Bailey is the lead attorney from the Department of Justice representing the Trump administration. A spokesman from the Census Bureau, which is within the Commerce Department, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDeluge of Trump-Leery Government Lawyers Join Job Market, Setting Up Free-for-All for Law Firm, In-House Openings
4 minute readThe Lawyers Picked (So Far) by Trump for Key Roles in His Second Administration
5 minute readTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250