Does a biological parent have greater rights to a child than an individual whose parental rights are established through a preconception agreement?

In New York, “parent” is defined by case law. As a result, six distinct avenues now exist in establishing legal parentage of a child: biology, adoption, presumption of legitimacy through marriage, assertion of estoppel (equitable and judicial) and the existence of a preconception agreement to have and raise a child together. A recent decision on appeal to the Appellate Division, First Department (K. v. C.) suggests that a hierarchy exists to parental creation whereby biology sits at the top of the ladder and the Court of Appeals’ recently devised preconception agreement rests at its lowest rung.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]