X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Recent developments in the Second Circuit’s interpretation of the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (FDCPA) have undermined the security of the safe harbor previously established by the court, and have created a situation whereby almost any debt collection letter is susceptible to claims that it violates FDCPA. The resulting confusion has resulted not only in a proliferation of FDCPA lawsuits, but has prevented debt collectors from knowing with any certainty what information they must convey to consumers, or what information they may convey to consumers. Ultimately, this lack of clear guidance harms the consumer, since debt collectors may convey either too little or too much information, potentially leaving consumers more confused than ever. Fortunately, the Second Circuit has ample opportunity to rectify the current situation and provide clear rules for all parties.

Enacted in 1978, the stated purpose of FDCPA is to “eliminate abusive debt collection practices by debt collectors, to insure that those debt collectors who refrain from using abusive debt collection practices are not competitively disadvantaged.” 15 U.S.C. §1692, et seq. To that end, FDCPA prohibits third-party debt collectors from making “any false, deceptive, or misleading representation or means in connection with the collection of any debt.” 15 U.S.C. §1692e. When determining whether a collection notice is “false, deceptive, or misleading,” courts of the Second Circuit judge the notice from the perspective of the “least sophisticated consumer,” meaning that a collection notice may be misleading if it is “open to more than one reasonable interpretation, at least one of which is inaccurate.” Avila v. Riexinger & Associates, 817 F.3d 72, 75 (2d Cir. 2016). The statute also requires debt collectors to provide the consumer with a written communication setting forth “the amount of the debt,” a seemingly simple provision that has turned into a minefield for collectors. 15 U.S.C. §1692g(a)(1).

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2019 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.