Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner partner J. Michael Jakes. (Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM)
The appellate court turned back arguments from Time Warner Cable—and amici Intel and Dell—that jurors had been prejudiced by admission of another verdict involving the same VoIP technology patents.
November 30, 2018 at 06:33 PM
1 minute read
Sprint Communications Co. and Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner have turned away a robust appellate challenge to the company’s $140 million patent infringement verdict against Time Warner Cable.
With amicus backing from Intel Corp. and Dell Inc., Time Warner complained that its 2017 trial had been prejudiced by the admission of Sprint’s 2007 verdict against Vonage over the same VoIP technology patents.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers recognizes U.S.-based law firms performing exemplary work on behalf of plaintiffs.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Breaking news and trends for law firm and legal departments about the evolving federal regulations in a volatile political climate.
