Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

A multinational software company is suing the U.S. Department of Labor for refusing to allow the firm to hire a foreign worker, in a dispute that features as its centerpiece a job posting on Monster.com that put the salary of the position at less than $1.00.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

Erin Mulvaney

Erin Mulvaney covers labor and employment issues from the Swamp to Silicon Valley. She's a Texas native based in Washington, D.C. Contact her at emulvaney@alm.com. On Twitter: @erinmulvaney

More from this author

Law Firms Mentioned

<p dir="ltr"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-989" src="http://www.almcms.com/contrib

    /uploads/sites/398/2017/10/DOL-building-Article-201710061729.jpg" alt="" width="558" height="372" /></p> <p dir="ltr">A multinational software company is suing the U.S. Department of Labor for refusing to allow the firm to hire a foreign worker, in a dispute that features as its centerpiece a job posting on Monster.com that put the salary of the position at less than $1.00.</p> <p dir="ltr">Chesterfield, Missouri-based Amdocs Inc.��<span style="text-decoration: underline"><strong><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0WW6B2On5rVLURFLU5kTDhCV1E/view">filed a lawsuit last week</a></strong></span>��against the Labor Department in Washingtons federal trial court for the agencys refusal to approve a ���labor certification application.��� That certification allows a company to��hire a foreign worker to work permanently in the United States.</p> <p dir="ltr">The company filed for the certification in 2011 to hire a "development group leader." Part of the process required the company to show the job would be available to any would-be U.S. worker and so it posted the job on Monster.com, the third-party job recruiting website.</p> <p dir="ltr">In that posting, the salary was listed for under or between ���$0.00 and $1.00.��� ��Because of that salary level, labor regulators rejected the certification application from Amdocs. Amdocs said that the salary in the labor certification application itself was identified at between $77,834 and $87,000.</p> <p dir="ltr">Amdocs, represented by New Yorks Barst Mukamal &amp; Kleiner, alleged the salary range in the Monster.com job posting was a placeholder and that no reasonable person would believe the compensation would be that low. The companys lawyers claimed that nobody from Amdocs asked for the salary to be placed that low on Monster.com.</p> <p dir="ltr"><span style="text-decoration: underline"><strong><a href="https://www.oalj.dol.gov/Decisions/ALJ/PER/2012/In_re_AMDOCS_INC_2012PER02510_(JUN_28_2017)_154213_CADEC_SD.PDF">An administrative law judge panel in June</a></strong></span>, six years after the original application was filed, agreed with the denial of the certification because of the low salary listing. The panel, pointing to a decision by a Labor Department certification officer, wrote: "[R]egardless of how the error occurred, the employer was ultimately responsible for ensuring the content of its recruitment complied with all the regulatory standards."</p> <p dir="ltr">The labor panel said the DOLs Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals has held that "even slight misrepresentations as to the salary of a position" can violate��<span style="text-decoration: underline"><strong><a href="https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/CFR-2012-title20-vol3/CFR-2012-title20-vol3-sec656-10">U.S. labor regulations</a></strong></span>.</p> <p dir="ltr">"Moreover, though it is unclear what precise effect the misreported wages had on recruitment, we are unwilling to accept the employer���s contention that the misrepresentation had no effect," the labor panel said in its ruling.</p> <p dir="ltr">Amdocs calls the decision in the lawsuit to deny the certification ���arbitrary and capricious.���</p> <p dir="ltr">���Without authorization from plaintiff, Monster.com inserted a default wage range of $0.00 to $1.00 per hour into that published job posting content. Defendants denial of Amdocs labor certification application results from Monsters unauthorized default wage range,��� according to the lawsuit.</p> <p dir="ltr">It goes on to say: ���Plaintiff did not confirm salary information with or otherwise provide such information to Monster.com or any intermediary when arranging to place the job posting. When published on the internet, Monster.com, without authorization, published a salary range of $0.00 to $1.00 in the job description content visible to the public.The $0.00 to $1.00 per hour was a default wage entry made unilaterally by a Monster.com administrator.���</p> <p dir="ltr">The lawsuit asks a Washington judge to overturn the Labor Departments determination that Amdocs recruitment effort violated U.S. regulations, and the company said it wants its labor certification application granted.</p> <em>Erin Mulvaney can be contacted at emulvaney@alm.com.</em> <


      Lean Adviser Legal

      Think Lean Daily Message

      "The entire event is blighted by task duplication, wasted effort on non-core activities and lack of focus. All of this creates needless expense for the client which, in turn, is a misuse of funds, which are a vital project asset."

      Learn More


      ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

      Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

      As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

      Copyright © 2018 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.