As news media and others ask the U.S. Supreme Court for video and audio coverage of upcoming blockbuster arguments this term, one justice—Elena Kagan—admitted Monday to being “very conflicted” about cameras in the high court.

In a question-and-answer period during an appearance at the University of Chicago’s Institute on Politics, Kagan was asked whether it wasn’t “hypocritical” when she voiced how rewarding and important it was to see school students in the public audience during oral arguments and yet many schools and others don’t have the economic resources to go to the court. Why shouldn’t there be video coverage of arguments so all can see what the court does, she was asked.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]