Clarity and consensus seemed beyond the U.S. Supreme Court’s reach on Monday as justices struggled to decide whether software and computer-dependent inventions are eligible for patents.

During arguments in Alice Corp. Ltd. v. CLS Bank International, several justices seemed dubious, viewing such innovations as “abstract ideas” ineligible under federal law—and no more patentable just because they are implemented by computers.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]