During an American Bar Association conference on communications law, Stevens was asked if the justices will ever allow televised oral arguments. Although Stevens had in the past been in favor, he said there is more merit in opposing them.
February 07, 2014 at 05:56 PM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens expressed doubts Friday about whether there should ever be cameras in the nation’s highest court.
During an American Bar Association conference on communications law, Stevens was asked by National Law Journal Supreme Court correspondent Tony Mauro if the justices will ever allow televised oral arguments.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers recognizes U.S.-based law firms performing exemplary work on behalf of plaintiffs.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Join the Mendocino County District Attorney s Office and work in Mendocino County home to redwoods, vineyards and picturesque coastline. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Breaking news and trends for law firm and legal departments about the evolving federal regulations in a volatile political climate.
