X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

A New Hampshire woman who emigrated from Rwanda in 1998 was stripped of her citizenship by a federal judge on February 21 after a jury found her guilty of lying on immigration forms about her affiliation with the political party that led the central African nation’s 1994 genocide. Beatrice Munyenyezi, 43, is to be sentenced in June in Concord, N.H., and faces up to 10 years in prison. The conviction is vindication for the office of Massachusetts U.S. Attorney Carmen Ortiz and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which first put Munyenyezi on trial in New Hampshire last March after spending years and an estimated $3 million investigating, interviewing and transporting dozens of witnesses from central Africa. That first effort ended in a mistrial, with the jury deadlocked after hearing government witnesses recount grisly tales about Munyenyezi, an ethnic Hutu who is married to a man who was convicted of war crimes by the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda in 2011. They accused Munyenyezi variously of helping plot the genocide in the southern Rwandan town of Butare, executing a nun, overseeing a roadblock in the town and deciding who the Interhamwe militia would kill, and feeding gangs of militiamen following gang-rapes. That testimony was attacked by defense lawyers David Ruoff and Mark Howard, who argued the stories had been manufactured by Rwanda’s current Tutsi-dominated government and lacked credibility, given that no one had mentioned their client, who was pregnant at the time, as a genocide leader during hundreds of hours of testimony about Butare at the Tanzania-based tribunal that convicted her husband. In their second attempt, prosecutors brought forward witnesses who painted Munyenyezi not as a nun-killer or militia leader but a more ordinary member of the Hutu-nationalist MRND political party who later lied about it on her immigration forms. "By watering down their case and making her less significant, they mitigated their argument," Ruoff said. "They took to heart what the last jury said, who apparently didn’t believe any of the witnesses." Contact Jason McLure at jmclure@alm.com.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2018 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.