One might look with suspicion upon a court that initially issues a unanimous decision in favor of one litigant, and then subsequently reverses course entirely and renders a unanimous decision for the other litigant. Yet that’s exactly what the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit did in In re Katrina Litigation. In March, a three-judge panel ruled — unanimously — that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers was not entitled to immunity under the Federal Tort Claims Act with respect to damages resulting from flooding in the wake of Hurricane Katrina allegedly arising out of negligent construction and maintenance of the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet. In September, the same three-judge panel issued a new opinion on rehearing, ruling instead — again unanimously — that the Corps was entitled to immunity.
To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.
Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.
ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at email@example.com