From cases on houseboats to flooding issues, the U.S. Supreme Court has had more than its fair share of water on the brain during the first week of the new term.
The justices on Wednesday waded into an unusual property rights case involving whether controlled flooding is a permanent or temporary taking. The case is unusual because the Roberts Court has had little interest in takings cases in the last seven years, and also because of the flooding question.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]