During a little-noticed oral argument over Indian lands in April, Justice Antonin Scalia did what he often does with lawyers whose positions he supports: He threw the advocate a lifeline.
Scalia stated his helpful view and told the lawyer, novice U.S. Supreme Court advocate Matthew Nelson, “You don’t disagree with that, do you?” Nelson, a partner at Warner Norcross & Judd in Grand Rapids, Mich., dutifully replied, “We don’t disagree.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]