Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Note: This article has been revised to reflect that the 20 suits had not yet been filed and to add comments from the plaintiffs’ side. It appears that those lawsuits against law schools will keep coming. The plaintiffs’ attorneys who have already launched class actions targeting 14 law schools announced on March 14 that they aim to sue an additional 20 schools in 10 states by Memorial Day. The latest round of possible litigation targets two schools in the top 50 as ranked by U.S. News & World Report — Pepperdine University School of Law and American University Washington College of Law, which were tied at No. 49. Eight of the new targets ranked between nos. 50 and 100. The existing suits are against schools ranking No. 65 or lower. The announcement was not unexpected. After the attorneys sued 12 schools in one day in early February, they declared their intention to file suit against 20 to 25 additional schools every few months. They allege that the targets committed fraud by inflating or misrepresenting their postgraduate employment data to lure students. In a press release, the plaintiffs’ attorneys said the average debt load for graduates of the 20 schools was almost $115,000. By suing so many schools at once, the plaintiffs’ attorneys hope to force some sort of a global settlement, perhaps brokered through the American Bar Association, said New York solo practitioner David Anziska. Alternatively, they might litigate individual cases that could eventually lead to a global settlement. “This practice really is endemic in many law schools,” he said of inflating post-graduate employment statistics. Anziska said that targeted schools claimed placement statistics that often topped out at 95 percent. However, newly revised numbers for the class of 2010 at a number of the schools showed a very different picture, with many students holding part-time or temporary jobs, or positions that don’t require a law degree, he said. The ABA has recently imposed more rigorous reporting requirements, but Anziska attributed the revised data to the threat of litigation. Representatives of a number of the targeted law schools declined to comment on the threat of litigation. In addition to Pepperdine and American, the attorneys hope to sue:

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2019 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.