Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
A group of immigration judges called for the U.S. attorney general to appoint one of their own as the next chief immigration judge, to reform what has been a problem-plagued and overburdened agency for years. “We have been totally resource-starved and things have been very slow in coming,” said Judge Dana Leigh Marks of San Francisco, who is president of the National Association of Immigration Judges. She noted that, last year, 214 immigration judges completed 350,000 cases, in “traffic court” conditions, despite issuing decisions with consequences that may be tantamount to life-or-death rulings. “This is not the time to appoint a chief immigration judge based on political or bureaucratic connections,” Marks said. Immigration judges are not part of the judiciary branch, but are hired by and work for the Justice Department in the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EIOR). Decisions can be appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals, also part of Justice. From there, appeals go for their first review to the U.S. circuit courts of appeal. Elaine Komis, an EIOR spokeswoman, said there is no time frame yet for appointment of a new chief judge. Komis said the agency has added 10 judges, increasing the total to 224 from 214 in the past six months. She also said digital audio recording systems have been installed in 29 of the nation’s 57 immigration court sites, covering 108 individual courtrooms. They expect to complete all 57 by 2010, she said. As far back as 2006, former U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales announced a 22-point plan to confront mounting complaints by federal appellate judges about the lack of quality in immigration judging and media reports of abusive judges who faced little or no discipline. By September 2008, little had been done to implement the Gonzales plan, according to a review of records by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, part of Syracuse University. The courts remain short of training and basic legal resources. The reforms called for a well-defined discipline system, improved audio taping of immigration hearings, more judges to deal with increased caseloads, more law clerks and training for judges. But circuit courts have continued to criticize individual actions by immigration judges. As recently as Feb. 23, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals cited Immigration Judge Jack W. Staton in Imperial City, Calif., for conducting independent research on the Internet of an alien’s claims, without informing the alien or providing an opportunity to respond. The court, in an unpublished order, sent the case of Kenyan Isaac Kigondu Kiniti-Wairimu, back to a new judge for reconsideration. Kiniti-Wairimu v. Holder, No. 05-70411. “At oral argument the judges made clear that they thought the case had been tainted,” said Sarah Simmons of Morrison & Foerster’s San Diego office, who handled the pro bono appeal. She said Kiniti-Wairimu was from a politically active family, and his family was jailed without charges when the regime changed. He was a student when this happened, and “if he returns he would be targeted,” she said, but the immigration judge discounted his account without providing a chance to respond. Staton was not available for comment. Komis declined to comment, saying the agency does not comment on individual cases.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.