Bernard L. McNamee, former commissioner on the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Courtesy photoSwitching Positions: US Solicitors General and Climate Change Lawsuits
The solicitor general should not make outcome-based arguments on inherently political issues; instead, the rule of law must always be the guiding principle for arguments to the court.
January 03, 2025 at 09:00 AM
6 minute read
Often called the "tenth justice," the solicitor general of the United States represents the interests of the United States before the U.S. Supreme Court. Though appointed by the president and working in the U.S. Department of Justice, the solicitor general is not only an advocate for the positions of the current administration in cases, but also represents the fundamental interests of the United States and the Constitution. This means that the solicitor general should be circumspect in changing the positions or “switching sides” taken by his or her predecessors in previous administrations in arguments he or she makes to the court. More importantly, it means that the solicitor general should not make outcome-based arguments on inherently political issues; instead, the rule of law must always be the guiding principle for arguments to the court.
This is why it is disappointing that President Joe Biden’s solicitor general has switched the legal positions taken by the Justice Department under Presidents Barack Obama and Donald Trump regarding federal preemption of state climate change lawsuits. On Dec. 10, the solicitor general urged the court to deny certiorari to review a decision of the Hawaii Supreme Court in Sunoco LLP v. City of Honolulu (Nos. 23-947 & 23-952).
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
EPA’s Forever Chemicals Plan Lacks Specifics, Environmental Lawyers Say
EPA Dismantles Environmental Justice Office, Weakens Civil Rights Protections, Experts Say
Supreme Court Seems Likely to Let Lawsuit Challenging California's Pro-EV Rules Proceed
Jenner & Block File New Lawsuit Challenging EPA's $20B Grant Terminations
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Activist Proxy Contests: An Evaluation
- 2Chancery Court Dismisses Challenge to a Del. Corporation’s Advance Notice Bylaws for Lack of Ripeness Following 'Kellner'
- 3AI-Powered Legal Marketing Startup FirmPilot Announces $4.7 Million in New Funding
- 4DEI, Immigration Policy Shifts Putting Legal, HR Teams to the Test
- 5Big Law Attorneys Open Up About Addiction, Recovery and Leaning on Others for Help
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.




