Judge William Alsup awarded $5.9 million in fees against Finjan last year while criticizing the conduct of its trial counsel. But on Wednesday, Federal Circuit judges suggested Alsup might not have been specific enough in his order to justify the entire fee award.
December 08, 2022 at 05:46 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
Three Federal Circuit judges had plenty of questions Wednesday about $5.9 million in attorney fees awarded against cybersecurity company Finjan Inc. in patent litigation last year.
There were no questions about the Finjan trial lawyers whom U.S. District Judge William Alsup of San Francisco blistered in his fee order.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers recognizes U.S.-based law firms performing exemplary work on behalf of plaintiffs.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Breaking news and trends for law firm and legal departments about the evolving federal regulations in a volatile political climate.
Judges Sharon Prost, left, and Pauline Newman of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. (Photo by Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM)
