"Contrary to plaintiff's position, there is no basis to conclude that Texas is the 'center of gravity' for either the consolidated action or the claims in the Texas action," U.S. District of New Jersey Chief Judge Freda Wolfson wrote.
September 20, 2022 at 03:31 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
The courts of New Jersey and Texas are in a standoff over which state should retain jurisdiction of a case in which an Austin publisher of 3D printed firearms documents is challenging a New Jersey law.
New Jersey has the upper hand, and is refusing a request from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to return the case to Texas on grounds an Austin trial court erroneously severed and transferred jurisdiction.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers recognizes U.S.-based law firms performing exemplary work on behalf of plaintiffs.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Breaking news and trends for law firm and legal departments about the evolving federal regulations in a volatile political climate.
Credit: microstock3D/Shutterstock
