Netflix Inc. might or might not have been the “prevailing party” in its dispute with patent assertion entity Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC.
But it will get to collect a $409,000 attorney fee award just the same.
Citing 'blatant gamesmanship' by patent owner Realtime Adaptive Streaming, the Federal Circuit affirms a trial judge's authority to award fees under his inherent equitable powers.
July 27, 2022 at 07:01 PM
3 minute read
Netflix Inc. might or might not have been the “prevailing party” in its dispute with patent assertion entity Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC.
But it will get to collect a $409,000 attorney fee award just the same.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers recognizes U.S.-based law firms performing exemplary work on behalf of plaintiffs.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS