"There is no federal cause of action to mollify hurt feelings—and the First Amendment guarantees there never will be," according to a motion to dismiss filed in a lawsuit brought by Alexander Vindman.
May 31, 2022 at 07:37 PM
3 minute read
The son of former President Donald Trump said statements he made against a key witness in his father’s impeachment trial are protected speech, and should shield him from a lawsuit accusing him of conspiracy and intimidation.
The nearly 60-page motion asks District Judge James Boasberg of the District of Columbia to dismiss the claims made by Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, a Ukraine native and military specialist whose testimony was the basis for Trump’s first impeachment trial.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers recognizes U.S.-based law firms performing exemplary work on behalf of plaintiffs.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Breaking news and trends for law firm and legal departments about the evolving federal regulations in a volatile political climate.
(L-R) Donald Trump Jr. and former Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman. Photo: David Handschuh/ALM/Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
