In a striking difference of opinion, Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Clarence Thomas parted ways on Thursday over the scope of the word “so” in the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.

Both justices are self-described “textualists” who, as Barrett said in her majority opinion, “start where we always do: with the text of the statute.” But they found little common ground in the court’s foray into cybersecurity under a law drafted during the 1980s.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]