Justice Clarence Thomas said the Supreme Court should have granted review to make clear whether state officials have the authority they claimed in the Pennsylvania case.
February 22, 2021 at 10:41 AM
1 minute read
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday put an end to a series of former President Donald Trump-related efforts to challenge the 2020 presidential election results, denying review in a series of cases.
The court, with three justices dissenting, rejected the Pennsylvania Republican Party’s challenge to its state Supreme Court’s extension of the filing deadline for absentee ballots in the election.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers recognizes U.S.-based law firms performing exemplary work on behalf of plaintiffs.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
At NJM, a top-rated insurance company, we are seeking an Attorney on our Workers Compensation legal team with between 3 and 5 years of expe...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Breaking news and trends for law firm and legal departments about the evolving federal regulations in a volatile political climate.
The U.S. Supreme Court building. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
