Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Judges Kimberly Moore, left, and Timothy Dyk are on opposite sides of American Axle v. Neapco Holdings.

The Supreme Court has before it the patent eligibility case that many believe presents the best chance in Term 2020 to clarify the court’s vexing rules.

American Axle & Manufacturing Inc. argues that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit improperly took the Section 101 patent eligibility test beyond high tech and life sciences and applied it to mechanical devices—in this instance, an automotive driveshaft. The company also contends that a divided Federal Circuit panel improperly decided factual issues and used eligibility as a catch-all to address an issue of Section 112 enablement.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

Scott Graham

Scott Graham focuses on intellectual property and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. He writes ALM's Skilled in the Art IP briefing. Contact him at [email protected]

More from this author

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.