Federal appeals judges offered biting characterizations of each other’s claims in a high-profile case over President Donald Trump’s D.C. hotel Thursday, issuing opinions that accused their opposing colleagues of undermining the judicial system and attempting to craft a bleak precedent for future legal challenges to the presidency.

The en banc U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled 9-6 to let a lawsuit from D.C. and Maryland officials alleging Trump is violating the Constitution’s emoluments clause move forward, rejecting the president’s request for the court to review a district judge’s denial of a motion to dismiss the case or to throw out the lawsuit entirely.