Feds Ask for Up to 9 Years in Prison for Roger Stone, Citing 'Contempt for This Court'
"Stone's criminal conduct was not an act of desperation," prosecutors wrote. "Rather, his conduct was undertaken purposefully, by someone who knew exactly what he was doing."
February 10, 2020 at 06:38 PM
7 minute read
Federal prosecutors are recommending that GOP political operative and longtime Trump associate Roger Stone be sentenced up to nine years in prison.
In a 26-page sentencing filing on Monday, prosecutors urged U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson to sentence Stone "consistent with the applicable advisory guidelines," and their calculation placed that guideline in the range of nearly seven to nine years in prison.
"Roger Stone obstructed Congress's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, lied under oath, and tampered with a witness. And when his crimes were revealed by the indictment in this case, he displayed contempt for this court and the rule of law," Monday's filing reads.
The attorneys from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia argued that Stone's conduct in relation to his crimes and after he was indicted merits a lengthier sentence than those given to others charged in relation to witness tampering, obstruction of justice or lying, citing Paul Manafort and Scooter Libby as examples.
"Stone's conduct over the past two years shows the low regard in which he holds the House Intelligence Committee's investigation and this very criminal case. That conduct suggests that a period of incarceration is warranted to achieve adequate deterrence," the filing reads.
"Stone's criminal conduct was not an act of desperation. He is a man of substantial means, and he has enjoyed a modicum of fame from his years of being a political advisor and confidant to powerful politicians, and from being an author and host of his own political radio show," prosecutors wrote. "Rather, his conduct was undertaken purposefully, by someone who knew exactly what he was doing."
The prosecutors also said that prison time will "deter others who intend to lie before Congress, obstruct a congressional proceeding, or tamper with a witness (or, in Stone's case, those who intend to commit all three criminal acts)."
"Such a sentence will also take into account Stone's conduct on pre-trial release, where he openly lied to this court about matters directly affecting the integrity of these proceedings," the filing continues.
The government attorneys also said that Stone's actions after his indictment "demonstrated the low regard in which he held these proceedings." They cited Stone's repeated violations of gag orders surrounding his case, and they accused Stone of communicating with InfoWars host Alex Jones ahead of the final day of his trial, quoting Jones as saying Stone told him to "ask for my pardon."
Stone's attorneys, in their own filing Monday, said their client does not require incarceration as a part of his sentence, especially when compared with what other people convicted in special counsel Robert Mueller's probe were sentenced to. Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort was sentenced to 7.5 years in prison between his two separate convictions in Washington, D.C., and the Eastern District of Virginia for bank and tax fraud charges, and charges connected to his past lobbying work for Ukraine. Another high-profile target, Michael Cohen, was sentenced to 36 months in prison for making false statements to congress, and campaign finance and banking charges.
Alex Vanderzwann, a former Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom associate, was sentenced to 30 days in prison for lying to federal agents about his contacts with Trump campaign deputy chairman Rick Gates. Gates, who was a key witness against Manafort, was sentenced to 45 days in prison and three years of probation after pleading guilty to conspiracy and lying to federal investigators.
"When viewed in the context of the other defendants sentenced for similar offenses stemming from the same investigation, the need to avoid disparities between similarly situated defendants indicates the applicability of a non-Guidelines sentence in the instant matter," Stone's attorney's said.
Stone's is represented by a Fort Lauderdale-based team of attorneys, including Bruce Rogow and Robert Buschel.
A Washington, D.C., jury in November found Stone guilty of lying to Congress, impeding a congressional investigation and witness tampering.
Stone's sentencing is scheduled for Feb. 20. It was originally set for Feb. 6, but his attorneys requested a delay, saying he was having trouble collecting all the financial documents needed for probation officers.
Stone was charged with lying about who he claimed was his intermediary to WikiLeaks in the lead-up to the 2016 presidential election, as he suggested at the time he had prior information about Democratic email dumps by the group. He had told congressional investigators that the go-between was his longtime associate, Randy Credico.
But emails obtained by special counsel Robert Mueller's office showed the source of Stone's information was actually conspiracy theorist Jerome Corsi. Corsi said last year that Mueller prosecutors had threatened him with an indictment for lying to investigators, and he and his attorney Larry Klayman later unsuccessfully tried to sue Mueller in federal court.
Stone's charge of witness tampering was also in relation to Credico, who he urged to not testify to congressional investigators. Prosecutors also said Stone threatened Credico's dog. Credico acknowledged on the stand during the trial that Stone sent the messages, but said he didn't believe that Stone meant to hurt him or his dog, Bianca.
Some, including Credico, have written to Jackson, urging her not to sentence Stone to prison. In his letter to Jackson in January, Credico said his own father spent 10 years in prison and "the mental scars of those years never left my father's soul."
"I understand that Roger Stone has broken federal laws, but a prison sentence is beyond what is required in this case. It is not justice. It is cruelty," Credico wrote.
Stone maintained his innocence even before his indictment last year, as reports indicated Mueller was preparing to file charges against him. He repeatedly used social media to share the message "Roger Stone did nothing wrong," even selling shirts emblazoned with the phrase to help pay his legal bills.
Jackson issued a partial gag order against Stone at the start of the case, blocking him from talking about it while inside or near the federal courthouse in Washington, D.C.
But after he posted an image on Instagram depicting Jackson with a crosshair in the corner, the judge ordered him to stop discussing the case entirely. Federal prosecutors later accused Stone of violating the order through Instagram posts about court filings in his case, which led Jackson to further tighten the order and block him from posting anything on Facebook, Instagram or Twitter.
After the verdict was handed down in Stone's trial, prosecutor Jonathan Kravis urged Jackson to order Stone be taken into custody immediately, indicating that Stone may have passed information along through an intermediary that was then discussed on InfoWars, the conspiracy theory outlet Stone has worked for in the past.
Jackson declined to remand Stone. But in an order last week, she said both Stone's lawyers and federal prosecutors could address any violations of her gag order in their sentencing filings.
Stone was the final person to be indicted by Mueller before the special counsel probe shut down. Other ongoing inquiries begun by the special counsel were referred to other branches of the Department of Justice, leaving open the possibility that other Mueller-tied indictments could still be forthcoming.
Read the DOJ memo:
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSplit 4th Circuit Ruling Is a Win for Covington & Burling in US Army Base Attack Litigation
3 minute readA Conversation with NLJ Lifetime Achievement Award Winner Jeff Smith
11 minute readBiden's Nominee Secures U.S. Senate Confirmation for Phila. Federal Judgeship
3 minute read'Export Violations'?: RTX Settles Civil Charges With $200M Consent Agreement
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250