No Bleeping Required: Jury Gets Uncensored Look at Roger Stone's Messages
Prosecutors almost seem to be relishing the use of vulgarities in U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson's courtroom.
November 11, 2019 at 02:18 PM
5 minute read
Trials are often mundane proceedings, but Roger Stone's has emerged as a spectacle peppered with vulgar and often obscene language.
Stone's messages with his associates are packed with obscenities, but the once-private correspondence are now on display for everyone—including the jury—to see and hear. And it's shattering the traditional norms of no swearing in the courtroom.
"Prepare to die cock sucker," Stone wrote in one message to associate Randy Credico, which was read out loud for the jury Thursday.
Typically straight-laced prosecutors almost seem to be relishing in the use of vulgarities in the courtroom of U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson of the District of Columbia, as they are using the language to argue Stone pressured Credico into not cooperating with the House Intelligence Committee's Russia probe and potentially even special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation.
Judges have wrestled in the past with how to handle profanity in their courtrooms. They have a lot of freedom on whether they want to quote it from evidence in their opinions or allow it in briefs, never mind whether they want it said out loud during proceedings.
Earlier this year, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to allow the word "fuck" to be said out loud or used in written briefs in a case involving a vulgar trademark for a clothing brand named FUCT. In that case, attorneys got creative in order to avoid uttering the four-letter word before the justices.
Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart, who defended the constitutionality of the law prohibiting vulgar trademarks, came up with the most creative way of describing the word without saying it during oral arguments: "This mark would be perceived by a substantial segment of the public as the equivalent of the profane past participle form of a well-known word of profanity and perhaps the paradigmatic word of profanity in our language."
In Stone's case, his attorneys said they did not recall an order from the judge about the use of language in the courtroom.
Kadia Koroma, a spokeswoman from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia, said that the "court was aware of the trial exhibits well before they were introduced into evidence."
"Before trial, neither party nor the court raised the issue/question concerning the coarse language included in some of the document evidence," Koroma wrote in an email.
The use of the obscenities in the messages is, at times, so frequent that if they were to be censored out, it could make the messages unintelligible to the jury and others watching the trial. The majority of the vulgar language stems from messages between Stone and Credico.
The task of repeating the messages mostly fell to Michelle Taylor, the former FBI agent for Stone's case. She left the bureau in August to join a private consulting firm, but was called to the stand Wednesday and Thursday to submit the majority of the evidence into the trial.
And so it was from Taylor, a young woman, that the jury heard most of the profane messages between the two older men.
"I know u are a dumb shit but read the Constitution. I have a constitutional right to call you a lightweight pantywaist cocksucker drunk asshole piece of shit and I just did," was one of Stone's messages to Credico that Taylor read out loud.
Bruce Rogow, Stone's Fort Lauderdale, Florida-based attorney, has admitted that the messages can be tough to read. "They're profane, they're rude, they're crude," he said during his opening statement Wednesday.
However, he argued, that's just the way Stone and Credico talk. Rogow painted a picture of a tumultuous relationship between Stone and Credico, who have opposing political beliefs.
Credico, during his appearance on the stand Thursday and Friday, refrained from repeating the vulgar language presented to him, even if it was from his own messages, choosing instead to trail off at the end of one such sentence.
"Do I have to pronounce these four letter words?" he asked, when reading out loud some messages between him and Stone. The prosecutor said Credico could omit them; Credico used the word "blank" instead.
"Waste of your time, tell him to go blank himself," was Credico's reading of one such message from Stone to him, about special counsel Robert Mueller.
Read more:
In Quoting Profanity, Some Judges Give a F#%&. Others Don't
Justices and Lawyers Sidestep Profanity in 'Scandalous' Trademark Case
Roger Stone's Lawyers Unveil Their Defense: He Didn't Mean to Lie
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWeil Lures DOJ Antitrust Lawyer, As Government Lateral Moves Pick Up Before Inauguration Day
4 minute readDOJ Files Antitrust Suit to Block Amex GBT's Acquisition of Competitor
Lavish 'Lies' Led to Investors Being Fleeced in Nine-Figure International Crypto Scam
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1MoFo Doubles Down on Private Equity in Asia
- 2The Value of ComFed for New Lawyers (And Not So New Ones)
- 3The 'Nonprofit Killer Bill': Separating Fear From Fact on HR 9495
- 4As U.S. Firms Gain Market Share, Freshfields Maintains Top Spot in European M&A Rankings
- 5People in the News—Jan. 13, 2025—McNees, Malamut Law
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250