SEC's Newest Whistleblower Charges Spotlight Investors as Potential Tipsters
"The SEC's whistleblower protections broadly protect not just employees, but anyone who seeks to report potential securities law violations to the commission," said Jane Norberg, the chief of the SEC's whistleblower office.
November 04, 2019 at 04:04 PM
3 minute read
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Monday charged a company and its chief executive with unlawfully trying to stop investors from reporting misconduct to federal regulators, an enforcement action that expands on whistleblower protection efforts that have been largely centered on employees.
In an amended complaint, filed in Manhattan federal district court, the SEC tacked on charges against the online auction portal Collectors Cafe and its CEO Mykalai Kontilai, who had been accused of making a fraudulent securities offering and misappropriating investors' money. The SEC alleged that Collectors Cafe conditioned the return of money to investors who signed agreements that they would not report potential misconduct to the commission or other government agencies.
"In one of these instances," the SEC said in the amended lawsuit, "Collectors Café and Kontilai even went so far as to file a lawsuit claiming that the victims breached the confidentiality provision by communicating with SEC staff about possible securities law violations."
Kontiliai's defense lawyer, Hughes Hubbard & Reed senior counsel Edward Little, declined to comment Monday. Collectors Cafe is represented by Gage Spencer & Fleming partner William Fleming, who also declined to comment on the new charges.
The new charges mark the first time in more than two years that the SEC has taken an enforcement action over alleged attempts to stymie communication with the commission. Previous enforcement actions centered on severance agreements, struck between companies and outgoing employees, with language the commission viewed as having a chilling effect on those employees coming forward with information about their former employers.
"The SEC's whistleblower protections broadly protect not just employees, but anyone who seeks to report potential securities law violations to the commission," said Jane Norberg, the chief of the SEC's whistleblower office.
The SEC's whistleblower office was created as part of the Dodd-Frank reforms that followed the financial crisis. Under the rules of the program, whistleblowers can receive between 10% and 30% of monetary sanctions received in an enforcement action. Since 2012, the SEC has awarded 66 tipsters, doling out nearly $400 million in whistleblower awards.
The SEC last brought a whistleblower-related enforcement action in January 2017, when the commission reached a $500,000 settlement with Home Street Inc. resolving claims that the financial services company used improper accounting methods and took steps to prevent whistleblowing.
According to the SEC, the company required former employees to sign agreements requiring them to waive their ability to receive a whistleblower award or risk losing their severance payments and other post-employment benefits.
In another notable settlement, Anheuser-Busch InBev agreed in 2016 to pay $6 million to resolve claims that it paid illegal bribes to build business in India and entered into a separation agreement that stopped an employee from continuing to voluntarily cooperate with the SEC's investigation.
Speaking at a recent conference in Washington, Norberg said companies appear to have learned from the settlements and removed language from separation agreements that could be read as deterring employees from contacting the SEC.
"I really do think everyone did a good job in taking a hard look at these agreements and figuring out what was the appropriate language," she said.
"That said, we do still see some, and we are still looking at them."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDOJ's Visa Antitrust Suit Hands Class Action Lawyers New Line of Attack Against Payments Giant
Visa Hires Antitrust Heavyweights to Carry Out DOJ-Misunderstands-the-Market Defense
Covington, Steptoe Form New Groups Amid Demand in Regulatory, Enforcement Space
4 minute readDOJ Files Antitrust Suit Against Visa Alleging It Thwarts Payment-Processing Rivals
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2GlaxoSmithKline Settles Most Zantac Lawsuits for $2.2B
- 3BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 4Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 5Inside Track: Late-Career In-House Leaders Offer Words to Live by
Who Got The Work
Eleanor M. Lackman of Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp has entered an appearance for Canon, the Japanese camera maker, and the Brooklyn Nets in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Sept. 16 in California Central District Court by T-Rex Law on behalf of technology company Phinge Corporation, pursues claims against the defendants for their ongoing use of the 'Netaverse' mark. The suit contends that the defendants' use of the mark in connection with a virtual reality platform will likely create consumer confusion. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall, is 2:24-cv-07917, Phinge Corporation v. Yankees Entertainment and Sports Network, LLC et al.
Who Got The Work
Fox Rothschild partner Glenn S. Grindlinger has entered an appearance for Garage Management Company in a pending lawsuit over alleged wage-and-hour violations. The case was filed Aug. 31 in New York Southern District Court by the Abdul Hassan Law Group on behalf of a manual worker who contends that he was not properly compensated for overtime hours worked. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres, is 1:24-cv-06610, Bailey v. Garage Management Company LLC.
Who Got The Work
Veronica M. Keithley of Stoel Rives has entered an appearance for Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC in a pending environmental lawsuit. The suit, filed Aug. 12 in Washington Western District Court by Kampmeier & Knutsen on behalf of Communities for a Healthy Bay, seeks to declare that the defendant has violated the Clean Water Act by releasing stormwater discharges on Puget Sound and Commencement Bay. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Benjamin H. Settle, is 3:24-cv-05662, Communities for a Healthy Bay v. Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC.
Who Got The Work
Caroline Pignatelli of Cooley has entered an appearance for law firm Cooley, partner Matt Hallinan, retired partner Michael Tu and a pair of Cooley associates in a pending fraud lawsuit related to the firm's representation of startup company Carbon IQ and founder Benjamin Cantey. The case, filed Sept. 26 in New Jersey District Court by the DalCortivo Law Offices on behalf of Gould Ventures and member Jason Gould, contends that the defendants deliberately or recklessly concealed critical information from the plaintiffs regarding fraud allegations against Cantey. Gould claims that he would not have accepted a position on Carbon IQ's board of directors or made a 2022 investment in the company if the fraud allegations had been disclosed. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Robert Kirsch, is 3:24-cv-09485, Gould Ventures, LLC et al v. Cooley, LLP et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom have stepped in to represent PDD Holdings, the operator of online marketplaces Pinduoduo and Temu, in a pending securities class action. The case, filed Sept. 30 in New York Eastern District Court by Labaton Keller Sucharow and VanOverbeke, Michaud & Timmony, contends that the defendants concealed information that rendered the growth of PDD unsustainable and posed substantial risks to PDD’s business, including merchant policies that made it unprofitable for vendors to do business on PDD platforms; malware issues on PDD applications; and PDD’s failure to implement effective compliance systems. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-06881, Macomb County Retiree Health Care Fund v. Pdd Holdings Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250