Tell us about your top U.S. Supreme Court or federal appeals court victory over the past year and how you and your team achieved the win.

We persuaded the Supreme Court to overturn 45 years of [Freedom of Information Act] precedent. A newspaper demanded sales information for 321,000 retail locations participating in SNAP (formerly “food stamps”). The government refused to disclose it, but lost at trial and abandoned the case. Our client intervened, invoking FOIA’s Exemption 4, which exempts “confidential” commercial information. Precedent deemed information “confidential” only if disclosure would generate “substantial competitive harm,” which the Eighth Circuit found speculative. The Supreme Court reversed, holding that FOIA requires no “competitive harm” showing at all.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at custome[email protected]