Michael Flynn Fires Covington Team as Sentencing Looms
A Thursday court filing indicates Flynn has already retained new counsel.
June 06, 2019 at 12:03 PM
4 minute read
Former Trump administration national security adviser Michael Flynn has split with his Covington & Burling legal team as he awaits sentencing on charges that he lied to the FBI.
In a court filing Thursday, Covington attorneys said Flynn was “terminating” his defense lawyers at the firm and had “already retained new counsel.” The revelation came in a motion, filed by Covington partners Robert Kelner and Stephen Anthony, to withdraw from Flynn's case in Washington federal court.
A Covington spokesman declined to comment. It was not immediately clear whom Flynn had hired to take up his defense, or why Flynn wants to split with his legal team.
Flynn pleaded guilty in 2017 to lying to the FBI about his discussions during the presidential transition with Sergey Kislyak, at the time Russia's top diplomat in the United States. He was set to be sentenced in December, with prosecutors backing his request for leniency.
But, in a dramatic two-hour hearing, he asked to delay his sentencing after U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan of the District of Columbia signaled that he could not rule out prison, and questioned whether Flynn could have faced more serious charges.
At the time, Kelner said the delay would allow Flynn to “eke out the last modicum of cooperation” in his deal to assist in a separate case being prosecuted in Alexandria, Virginia, involving two of Flynn's former business associates.
The notice of Covington's firing came during a period of heightened interest in Flynn's case.
Last week, prosecutors rebuffed an order to make public the transcripts of Flynn's conversations with Kislyak, in which the two discussed sanctions the Obama administration imposed on Russia for its interference in the 2016 election. Prosecutors, resisting Sullivan's order, said the government “represents that it is not relying on any other recordings, of any person, for purposes of establishing the defendant's guilt or determining his sentence, nor are there any other recordings that are part of the sentencing record.”
Sullivan told prosecutors on Tuesday that they did not have to make public the transcripts of Flynn's calls with Kislyak. At the end-of-May deadline, prosecutors complied with a separate order to publicly release the transcript of a voice mail Kelner received in November 2017 from John Dowd, then a personal lawyer for President Donald Trump. The call from Dowd came after Flynn withdrew from a joint defense agreement with Trump, signaling that he'd begun cooperating with Mueller's office.
Listen to the voice mail:
In the transcript, much of which was provided in the 448-page report summarizing Mueller's investigation, Trump's lawyer is quoted discussing the president's “feelings toward Flynn.” The voice mail was examined as part of Mueller's investigation into whether Trump or his associates sought to obstruct the Russia investigation.
Mueller's office found no evidence of coordination between the Trump campaign and Kremlin but did not clear the president on the obstruction charge. “If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so,” Mueller said last week in his first public remarks on the two-year investigation.
Read more:
'Thanks, Pal.' Read Trump Attorney's Message to Flynn Lawyer About Cooperation
Judge Declines to Press Prosecutors to Release Michael Flynn Transcripts
Mueller Says His Report 'Speaks for Itself' in First Public Remarks
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSkadden and Steptoe, Defending Amex GBT, Blasts Biden DOJ's Antitrust Lawsuit Over Merger Proposal
4 minute readQuinn Emanuel Files Countersuit Against DOJ in Row Over Premerger Reporting
3 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute read'Thoughtful Jurist': Maryland US District Senior Judge Messitte Dies After Short Illness
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Is 1st Circuit the New Center for Trump Policy Challenges?
- 2Justices Grill US Government in Venue Dispute Over FDA Vape Challenges
- 3Change Is Coming With the New Trump Era. For Big Law, Change Is Already Here
- 4Private Equity in the UK: The 2025 View From Top Partners
- 5Announcing the 2025 Legalweek Leaders in Tech Law Awards Finalists, Lifetime Achievement Winners & Monica Bay Women of Legal Tech Winners
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250