DC Circuit Is Urged to Fast-Track Trump's Subpoena Appeal
The proposed schedule would push the dispute into mid-July, and during that time the House would agree to suspend the production of documents that are required by the subpoena to Mazars.
May 22, 2019 at 07:15 PM
5 minute read
Lawyers for Donald Trump and for the U.S. House on Wednesday asked a Washington federal appeals court to expedite its review of a congressional subpoena that seeks financial records from the president's longtime accounting firm.
The new case in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit will mark the first time a federal appeals panel will weigh a House subpoena that demands Trump-related financial information. The president has vowed to resist congressional subpoenas seeking records and testimony from lawyers and other officials in his orbit.
U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta of the District of Columbia on Monday ruled Trump and his businesses have no lawful ground to block the House Oversight Committee subpoena that was served on the accounting firm Mazars USA LLP. Mazars, represented by a team from Blank Rome, has not taken a position on the demand for records.
“Courts have grappled for more than a century with the question of the scope of Congress's investigative power,” Mehta said in his ruling. “The binding principle that emerges from these judicial decisions is that courts must presume Congress is acting in furtherance of its constitutional responsibility to legislate and must defer to congressional judgments about what Congress needs to carry out that purpose.”
Trump's attorneys—he is represented by the firms Consovoy McCarthy Park and Michael Best & Friedrich—on Wednesday jointly filed court papers asking the D.C. Circuit to expedite the appeal. The proposed schedule would push the dispute into mid-July, and during that time the House would agree to suspend the production of documents that are required by the subpoena to Mazars.
“I was very encouraged earlier this week when the district court issued its strong ruling supporting Congress' right to conduct investigations, and I am encouraged that we have now been able to reach this agreement to seek an expedited appeal,” U.S. Rep. Elijah Cummings, chairman of the House Oversight Committee, said in a statement. “I hope the court approves our request so we can move forward and effectively discharge our responsibilities under the Constitution.”
The court filing said Mazars has agreed to continue “collecting and preparing responsive documents but not to produce any documents in response to the subpoena during that period.”
Trump's attorneys said they would file “emergency” court papers to freeze enforcement of Mehta's ruling if the D.C. Circuit does not agree to the proposed expedited schedule.
“The committee, through counsel for the House of Representatives, agrees to suspend the time for production set by the subpoena until that motion is decided and, if it is denied, until seven days thereafter,” according to Wednesday's court filing.
The litigation in the D.C. Circuit is unfolding amid a broader dispute between House Democrats and the White House related to ongoing investigations of Trump and his business empire, access to his tax returns, and access to an unredacted copy of the special counsel's investigation of Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential election.
Trump's lawyers had urged a New York federal court to block a subpoena that involves House Democrats' demands for information from Deutsche Bank and Capital One. U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos of the Southern District of New York, who heard arguments Wednesday afternoon, ruled against Trump. Ramos, like Mehta, also denied to stay enforcement of the subpoena pending Trump's appeal.
Democrats and other critics of the Trump administration are hopeful the federal courts will move quickly on the various subpoena fights. Mehta sped up his deliberation of the accounting firm subpoena, over objections made by Trump's legal team.
Both sides Wednesday asked the D.C. Circuit to hear oral arguments sometime after mid-July, which would mark a rare hearing for the court. The D.C. Circuit's argument cycle typically ends in May, and it resumes in the fall.
Wednesday's court filing in the D.C. Circuit was signed by Douglas Letter, the U.S. House general counsel; William Consovoy of Washington's Consovoy McCarthy, a lead attorney for Trump; and Jerry Bernstein of Blank Rome, a lawyer for Mazars.
Read more:
Trump Loses a Second Subpoena Fight, This Time in NY
US Judge Backs House Subpoena for Trump Financial Records
Consovoy McCarthy Makes an Outsized Mark on Washington
Abbe Lowell, Facing House Intel Probe, Turns to Carol Elder Bruce
In the 'Chaos': Stephen Boyd Is DOJ's Point Man as Democrats Dial Up Pressure
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBankruptcy Filings Surged in First Half of 2024 Amid Uptick in Big Chapter 11 Cases
3 minute readTrump Financial Statements From 2011 to 2020 'Should No Longer Be Relied Upon,' Accountant's GC Says
Bonuses and Beyond: Law Firms Wrap Up Lucrative Year With Record-High Rewards
Trending Stories
- 1FTC Chair Lina Khan Sues John Deere Over 'Right to Repair,' Infuriates Successor
- 2‘Facebook’s Descent Into Toxic Masculinity’ Prompts Stanford Professor to Drop Meta as Client
- 3Pa. Superior Court: Sorority's Interview Notes Not Shielded From Discovery in Lawsuit Over Student's Death
- 4Kraken’s Chief Legal Officer Exits, Eyes Role in Trump Administration
- 5DOT Nominee Duffy Pledges Safety, Faster Infrastructure Spending in Confirmation Hearing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250