Women Lawyers' Group Stands Up for Jessie Liu After DOJ Nomination Scuttled
The National Association of Women Lawyers, where Jessie Liu was once a vice president, issued a broad statement Monday condemning criticism focused on her ties to the nonprofit and its opposition to Samuel Alito's nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court.
April 01, 2019 at 02:07 PM
5 minute read
Just days after U.S. Attorney Jessie Liu in Washington withdrew from consideration for a top Justice Department post, an association of women lawyers decried the objections to her nomination as “misplaced” and said they were improperly used to derail her ascension to the third-in-command role as associate attorney general.
Liu, the top federal prosecutor in Washington and a former Big Law white-collar partner, ran into opposition on the Senate Judiciary Committee over her past affiliation with the National Association of Women Lawyers, a group that opposed Justice Samuel Alito's nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court in 2006. Liu's past affiliation with the group particularly irked Republican U.S. Sen. Mike Lee of Utah, a former Alito clerk, who questioned her conservative bona fides, including her stance on abortion.
In a statement Monday, the NAWL broadly criticized the opposition to Liu's nomination over her ties to the group, where she had been vice president in 2005 at the time the opposition to Alito was publicized. The association said the criticism of Liu could have a chilling effect on lawyers interested in joining bar associations and other professional organizations.
“Objections were raised to U.S. Attorney Liu's past involvement with NAWL—a 120-year-old non-profit organization that has fought to ensure equal opportunity and advancement of women lawyers in the legal profession and gender equality under the law,” the organization said in its statement. “These objections were misplaced, and were improperly used to derail U.S. Attorney Liu's nomination.”
Liu has said she was not involved in the group's letter opposing his confirmation to the Supreme Court. At the time, she had, in fact, joined with fellow Yale Law School alumni in signing a letter supporting Alito's nomination. “She supported Alito's nomination and disagreed with the NAWL committee's position,” the National Review's David French, who said he spoke with Liu, reported last month.
In a last-ditch effort to save her nomination, U.S. Attorney General William Barr spoke on the phone with Lee, but the conversation devolved into a shouting match, according to a source familiar with the talk. Barr, who'd recommended Liu for the nomination to serve as associate attorney general, appointed her last week as the new chairwoman of his advisory committee of U.S. attorneys. Liu formerly was a partner at Morrison & Foerster and Jenner & Block before joining the Trump administration in 2017.
“Jessie Liu is one of the finest, most impressive people serving in the Department of Justice. She has been an outstanding United States attorney and would have made an outstanding associate attorney general,” Barr said in a statement Friday, after Liu formally withdrew from consideration. “I have zero doubt she would have faithfully executed my priorities and advanced my rule-of-law agenda. Because I need Jessie to play a broader role in the department, I am appointing her forthwith to be chairwoman of the Attorney General's Advisory Committee.”
Liu's past affiliation with NAWL prompted a broader discussion in conservative circles about the possible pitfalls of joining professional groups. French, writing at the National Review, said the attention to Liu's past role with the women lawyers' group resonated with “a number of conservative lawyers.”
“Young conservative attorneys frequently grapple with the question of how much they should engage with ostensibly 'neutral' legal organizations—especially early in their careers. Bar associations and other legal organizations can offer invaluable training, mentoring, and networking,” French wrote in his piece. “However, to the extent they engage in politics, they tend to veer left. Do you turn your back on the mentoring and networking to avoid the politics, or do you engage with the group and hang in as long as you can?”
NAWL said nonprofit organizations “serve critical functions in this country and form a tapestry of community, uniting us in service to higher ideals.”
Lawyers such as Liu “who seek to serve in government should be encouraged, not shamed, to serve in bar associations and other organizations that promote women in their chosen professions and advocate for equality under the law and diversity and inclusion in the workplace,” the organization said. “Chilling such service is a disservice to this nation and the freedoms we hold dear.”
Read the statement the National Association of Women Lawyers issued:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
Ex-Deputy AG Trusts U.S. Legal System To Pull Country Through Times of Duress
7 minute read'Even Playing Field?' Wiley Rein Intervenes in Federal Election Campaign Spending Row
3 minute readBig Law Lawyers Fan Out for Election Day Volunteering in Call Centers and Litigation
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1When Dealing With Child Abuse Cases, Attorneys Need to Know How Children Perceive Time
- 2Like a Life Raft: Ben Brafman Reflects on Nearly 50 Years as a Defense Attorney
- 3HSF Partner Removed Over ‘Deeply Offensive’ Tweets
- 4Another Latham Partner Heads to Sidley in London
- 5In 'Kousisis,' the DOJ Once Again Pushes the Limits of Federal Fraud Prosecutions
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250