Manafort Faces First Sentencing Judge: 3 Things to Watch
Paul Manafort will learn his fate Thursday afternoon, when a federal judge in Alexandria, Virginia, sentences the former Trump campaign chair for financial…
March 06, 2019 at 06:29 PM
4 minute read
Paul Manafort will learn his fate Thursday afternoon, when a federal judge in Alexandria, Virginia, sentences the former Trump campaign chair for financial fraud convictions.
Manafort was convicted on eight counts of tax and bank fraud last year following a lengthy trial in the Eastern District of Virginia. It garnered significant media attention, in part because Manafort was the first defendant in a case brought by special counsel Robert Mueller III to force prosecutors to trial. The longtime lobbyist will also be the first person convicted in Mueller's probe to receive more than a month in prison.
Manafort, who turns 70 in April, is already staring down the possibility of spending the rest of his life in prison. Sentencing guidelines estimate a range of 19.5 to 24.5 years for his crimes in Virginia, prosecutors told U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis III in a Feb. 23 filing. But Manafort could face additional time from a separate criminal case in Washington, D.C.
Seeking leniency, Manafort's attorneys have told the judge in court papers that Manafort has accepted responsibility for his actions. Prosecutors painted Manafort as a criminal who brazenly and repeatedly violated the law to hide the millions of dollars he made through his foreign lobbying work form the U.S. Treasury Department.
Here are things we're watching:
|Will Manafort speak?
Since Manafort was first charged in the District in October 2017, the public has heard little from the man himself. Manafort did not testify during his trial in Virginia last year.
He could make rare remarks tomorrow in hopes of persuading Ellis to give him a lenient sentence. His attorneys have said in court papers that Manafort has already suffered the consequences of his actions, a point that Manafort could emphasize.
The hearing will also mark Manafort's first time back in Ellis' courtroom after the lobbyist appeared at a hearing last year in a wheelchair with a bandaged foot. His attorneys have said Manafort, who is currently jailed in Virginia, has suffered from gout and depression.
|What Will Judge Ellis Say?
Whether Ellis makes any comment as he hands Manafort his sentence will be worth watching. The Ronald Reagan appointee made waves early on in Manafort's case when he publicly lambasted the special counsel probe. Manafort's lawyers have even played up those themes in their sentencing memos, writing: “The Special Counsel's strategy in bringing charges against Mr. Manafort had nothing to do with the Special Counsel's core mandate—Russian collusion—but was instead designed to 'tighten the screws' to compel Mr. Manafort to cooperate and provide incriminating information about others.”
Ellis—an at times humorous, at times cantankerous force—also caught heat during the trial for needling prosecutors to quicken their pace.
The judge has also been critical of federal sentencing laws. In a sentencing hearing for a convicted drug dealer last year, Ellis expressed frustration with mandatory minimums, as he sentenced the man to the minimum of 40 years' imprisonment. “This situation presents me with something I have no discretion to change and the only thing I can do is express my displeasure,” he said.
|What About the D.C. Sentencing?
Manafort is also set to be sentenced in Washington, D.C., on March 13. Judge Amy Berman Jackson will sentence him after he pleaded guilty in September to two criminal counts: conspiring against the United States and conspiring to tamper with potential witnesses. She'll also likely take into account her finding this month that Manafort intentionally lied to federal authorities during the course of his cooperation, in violation of his plea deal.
Manafort's attorneys say he faces a maximum of 10 years combined for those counts in D.C. They've also argued that he should serve his sentences in D.C., and Virginia, at the same time, because they say the underlying conduct in those cases was related. Prosecutors have not yet told judges whether Manafort should serve his sentences concurrently or consecutively.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All11 Red State AGs Demand Damages in Antitrust Lawsuit Shaming ESG Climate Investors
3 minute readAuditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Employers Scramble to Get Immigration Records in Order Ahead of Trump Crackdown
- 2‘How to Succeed as a Trial Lawyer’: Talking Shop With Author and Veteran Litigator Stewart Edelstein
- 3Court of Appeals Holds that Arbitration Agreements Can Be Formed Through ‘Clickwrap’ Process
- 4In Today’s Cutthroat Market, Regions Need a Business Case
- 5Steptoe Offers Associates New Flexible Billable Hour Tracks in Revamped Comp System
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250