Eighteen months after ruling a statutory ban on "disparaging" marks unconstitutional, the justices will address a related provision banning "scandalous" and "immoral" marks.
January 04, 2019 at 06:59 PM
1 minute read
The Supreme Court is going to get “Fuct.”
The justices agreed Friday to look at whether the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office can refuse to register the Fuct mark for a line of apparel. At issue is a 113-year-old statutory provision that prohibits registration of “immoral” or “scandalous” trademarks.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers recognizes U.S.-based law firms performing exemplary work on behalf of plaintiffs.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Breaking news and trends for law firm and legal departments about the evolving federal regulations in a volatile political climate.
