Democratic State AGs Take First Step in Appealing 'Ludicrous' Ruling Killing ACA
The group of states, led by California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, are expected to argue that the law's individual mandate remains constitutional despite a federal tax law passed in 2017 that zeroed out its tax penalty.
January 03, 2019 at 03:05 PM
3 minute read
The coalition of state attorneys general defending the Affordable Care Act have taken the first step in appealing a federal judge's ruling in Texas that declared the entirety of the 2010 law unconstitutional.
The group of states, led by California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, are expected to argue that the law's individual mandate remains constitutional despite a federal tax law passed in 2017 that zeroed out its tax penalty. The AGs contend that even if the individual mandate is struck down, the rest of the law's provisions should be allowed to stand.
The states filed their notice of appeal in the Northern District of Texas on Thursday. The attorneys general in a call with reporters described the underlying ruling by U.S. District Judge Reed O'Connor of the Northern District of Texas as based on a “flimsy theory” and “ludicrous.”
The case will go before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Phil Weiser, the state attorney general-elect in Colorado, indicated Thursday that he plans to join the coalition of states defending the Affordable Care Act. Weiser said O'Connor's ruling finding the ACA's individual mandate is inseverable from the whole law goes against the “mainstream view on all sides of the aisle.”
“Congress had the opportunity to, and did not, repeal the law,” Weiser said. “It's not for a judge to then effectively repeal the whole law. All Congress did, and all that this law is based on is it reduced the tax penalty. To take that action and try to leverage it into invalidating the entire law … it's an affront to the rule of law.”
The AGs' filing comes shortly after O'Connor stayed his ruling Dec. 30 after finding residents in many states have already purchased their health insurance plans for 2019.
O'Connor initially ruled Dec. 14 that a congressional tax law passed in 2017, which zeroed out the penalty imposed by the ACA's individual mandate, rendered the whole health care law unconstitutional.
A group of mostly conservative states, led by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, filed their constitutional challenge to the ACA in February. Those states contended that the congressional tax law effectively rendered the individual mandate unconstitutional, as well as two protections they said were inseverable from the mandate: the law's community rating requirement and its guaranteed coverage for pre-existing conditions.
Becerra and the cluster of Democratic state attorneys general have led the fight defending the health care law's survival after the Justice Department dropped its defense in June.
Read more:
Texas Judge Stays His ACA Ruling, but Adds an Appeal Is Unlikely to Succeed
'Embarrassingly Bad,' 'Unmoored': Legal Scholars Bash Texas Judge's ACA Takedown
Judiciary Committee Sets Hearing Date for AG Nominee William Barr
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBrownstein Adds Former Interior Secretary, Offering 'Strategic Counsel' During New Trump Term
2 minute readWeil, Loading Up on More Regulatory Talent, Adds SEC Asset Management Co-Chief
3 minute readFTC Sues PepsiCo for Alleged Price Break to Big-Box Retailer, Incurs Holyoak's Wrath
5 minute readSupreme Court Will Hear Religious Parents' Bid to Opt Out of LGBTQ-Themed School Books
Trending Stories
- 1Walt Disney, IBM Denied High Court Review of Old NY Franchise Tax Law
- 2The Right Amount?: Federal Judge Weighs $1.8M Attorney Fee Request with Strip Club's $15K Award
- 3Is 1st Circuit the New Center for Trump Policy Challenges?
- 4Justices Grill US Government in Venue Dispute Over FDA Vape Challenges
- 5Change Is Coming With the New Trump Era. For Big Law, Change Is Already Here
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250