At Gibson Dunn, This Facebook Lawyer Inked FTC Privacy Deal Now in Spotlight
The Federal Trade Commission is investigating whether Facebook violated the terms of a 2011 settlement over its handling of user data. That settlement required Facebook to obtain express consent before sharing user information beyond what individual privacy settings allow. Inside Facebook, one lawyer is especially familiar with the terms of that 7-year-old settlement.
March 20, 2018 at 02:58 PM
7 minute read
Gibson Dunn offices in Washington. Credit: Diego M. Radzinschi/ ALM
Updated on Monday, March 26
Amid broader concerns about how Russia exploited social media to interfere in the 2016 election, Facebook Inc. faces growing scrutiny over the transfer of up to 50 million users' personal data to a voter-profiling firm linked to President Donald Trump's campaign.
Lawmakers have called for Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg to be summoned for hearings in Washington. Another Facebook executive, Chief Information Officer Alex Stamos, plans to leave the company later this year—reportedly after meeting resistance when he advocated for more transparency about Russia's use of the social media platform.
The Federal Trade Commission on March 26 confirmed an open investigation into Facebook's privacy practices. “Companies who have settled previous FTC actions must also comply with FTC order provisions imposing privacy and data security requirements. Accordingly, the FTC takes very seriously recent press reports raising substantial concerns about the privacy practices of Facebook,” Tom Pahl, acting director of the FTC's consumer protection bureau, said in a statement. “Today, the FTC is confirming that it has an open non-public investigation into these practices.”
Indeed, Facebook's 2011 settlement with the FTC over its handling of user data required the company to, among other things, obtain express consent before sharing user information beyond what individual privacy settings allow.
Inside Facebook, one lawyer is especially familiar with the terms of that 7-year-old settlement.
In 2011, S. Ashlie Beringer was one of the two Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher partners—along with M. Sean Royall—who signed the FTC settlement with Facebook's general counsel at the time, Theodore Ullyot.
Ashlie BeringerTwo years after guiding Facebook to that agreement, in 2013, Beringer left Gibson Dunn to become vice president and deputy general counsel at Facebook, where she leads the global regulatory, product and privacy legal team.
Also on the settlement was the director of the FTC's consumer protection bureau at the time, David Vladeck, who said Beringer's involvement in the 2011 settlement “makes her uniquely well-prepared to represent Facebook's position in this matter.”
“She's the principal signer of the consent decree. She was actively involved in negotiating the decree. My impression of her is she's one hell of a good lawyer,” Vladeck said in an interview Tuesday.
Beringer, formerly a Gibson Dunn partner in Palo Alto, California, did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday. Facebook also did not immediately comment.
“We reject any suggestion of violation of the consent decree. We respected the privacy settings that people had in place,” Facebook told The Washington Post in a March 18 report. “Privacy and data protections are fundamental to every decision we make.”
The New York Times and The Guardian reported over the weekend that a voter-profiling company, Cambridge Analytica, mined the personal information of more than 50 million Facebook users without their permission—data that was then wielded for targeting political advertising. Cambridge Analytica obtained the data from Aleksandr Kogan, a researcher who developed an app he claimed would only be scraping users' information for academic purposes.
In recent days, Vladeck has said Cambridge Analytica's harvesting of that data raises questions about whether Facebook has complied with the terms of the 2011 consent decree.
“The real problem for Facebook is there are multiple provisions of the consent decree that— at least from what I know now—there's real reason to believe were violated by Facebook,” Vladeck said. “This is a violation of a consent, so civil penalties are available to the commission if a violation occurred. So this will be a very serious investigation by the FTC.”
Vladeck said Facebook's team of lawyers in 2011 included not only Ullyot and Beringer but Gibson Dunn partner Eugene Scalia and the company's deputy general counsel at the time, Colin Stretch, who took an active role in the FTC negotiations and traveled to Washington to meet with agency officials.
Stretch, now the Facebook general counsel, has served as the face of Facebook as the company, along with Google and Twitter, have been questioned about Russian-purchased election advertisements.
Paul Grewal. Credit: Jason Doiy/ ALMPaul Grewal, vice president and deputy general counsel at Facebook, has been the company's name on statements responding to the scrutiny over the data acquisition by Cambridge Analytica. Grewal is a former federal magistrate judge in California who joined Facebook in 2016.
“The claim that this is a data breach is completely false. Aleksandr Kogan requested and gained access to information from users who chose to sign up to his app, and everyone involved gave their consent,” Grewal said in a statement March 17. “People knowingly provided their information, no systems were infiltrated, and no passwords or sensitive pieces of information were stolen or hacked.”
The FTC's renewed investigation into Facebook could bring about a reunion of sorts.
Six years after signing the Facebook settlement, Maneesha Mithal continues to serve as the associate director overseeing the privacy and identity protection division within the FTC's consumer protection bureau. And another FTC attorney, Laura Berger, still works in the agency's privacy and identity protection division.
Christopher Olsen, who served as the division's assistant director at the time of the settlement, has since become a partner at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, where he focuses on privacy, cybersecurity, and data security issues. Another FTC attorney on the 2011 settlement, Manas Mohapatra, left the agency in 2013 to become an associate general counsel at Twitter. He left in November to become the chief global privacy counsel at Viacom.
The FTC said last week in a statement: “We are aware of the issues that have been raised but cannot comment on whether we are investigating. We take any allegations of violations of our consent decrees very seriously as we did in 2012 in a privacy case involving Google.”
In that case, Google paid a $22.5 million penalty to resolve claims that it misrepresented to users of Apple's Safari browser that it would not place tracking “cookies” or serve targeted ads to them, in violation of a settlement reached in October 2011.
“The record setting penalty in this matter sends a clear message to all companies under an FTC privacy order,” then-FTC chairman Jon Leibowitz, now a partner at Davis, Polk & Wardwell, said in a statement. “No matter how big or small, all companies must abide by FTC orders against them and keep their privacy promises to consumers, or they will end up paying many times what it would have cost to comply in the first place.”
This report was updated with additional information about the FTC's open investigation of Facebook's privacy practices.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNevada Supreme Court to Decide Fate of Groundbreaking Contingency Cap Ballot Measure
5 minute readReported Refusal to Officiate Gay Wedding Prompts Review by NY Judicial Misconduct Watchdog
Trending Stories
- 1Three Reasons CLOs Are Critical to the Successful Adoption of Generative AI
- 2Bondi and Big Tech: What Trump's Choice for US AG Could Mean for Antitrust Enforcement
- 3People in the News—Dec. 9, 2024—Lamb McErlane, Dechert
- 4How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'Get Out From Behind Your Desk,' Says Evan Rassman of Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall & Furman
- 5The Rise of AI and Other Changes Abound in the Law: A 2024 Year-End Review
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250