Leave Jeff Sessions Out of Tax Audit, Feds Tell Colorado Marijuana Dispensary
The U.S. attorney general's cancellation of the Cole memo "does not mean that petitioners now face an elevated danger of self-incrimination by cooperating with the IRS audits," a Justice Department tax lawyer tells a Colorado judge.
February 01, 2018 at 03:09 PM
4 minute read
U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions. Credit: Diego M. Radzinschi / ALM
The U.S. Justice Department, defending an Internal Revenue Service summons targeting a Colorado marijuana dispensary, said the recent rescission of federal marijuana enforcement policy doesn't ratchet up the risk of cooperating with a tax audit.
Rejecting the dispensary's demand for immunity, Charles Butler, a trial attorney in the DOJ's tax division in Washington, said in court papers filed on Wednesday that the so-called Cole memo—named after Obama-era Deputy Attorney General James Cole—never hindered the IRS from enforcing tax laws.
“Congress, not the Justice Department, sets policy directives,” Butler wrote, “and in any event the Justice Department could 'displace these memoranda at any time.'”
Butler added: “The department's action, however, does not mean that petitioners now face an elevated danger of self-incrimination by cooperating with the IRS audits.”
The IRS, fighting in Colorado federal district court, is seeking access to state-held records as part of its investigation into Standing Akimbo's 2014 and 2015 tax returns. The owners of the dispensary have asked the court to block the summonses the tax agency has issued to Colorado's Marijuana Enforcement Division for data from its marijuana tracking system.
Standing Akimbo's owners contend tax agents could share that information with federal prosecutors, putting them at risk of drug charges. That threat was compounded last month, according to the dispensary's attorney, when U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions revoked Obama-era guidance shielding certain state-legal marijuana operations from federal scrutiny.
“If absolute immunity is not granted to the taxpayer, there will be a full claim of Fifth Amendment privilege,” James Thorburn of Thorburn Walker, said in a letter to the IRS last month.
Thorburn could not immediately be reached for comment Thursday.
In Wednesday's filing, Butler said the dispensary owners had cited no legal basis for requiring the IRS to grant immunity in these circumstances. The IRS is limited by statute in what it can share with prosecutors, he said. If law enforcement agents want to pursue federal drug charges against Standing Akimbo, they could simply look for evidence on the dispensary's website or check out the store's “shelves or displays stocked full of marijuana,” he said.
“It is unlikely, therefore, that any law enforcement authority would need the information the IRS summonses seek to prove that petitioners are violating federal drug laws,” Butler wrote.
Thorburn Walker represents a number of dispensaries challenging IRS authority to pursue state-legal marijuana businesses. The Green Solution Retail Inc. petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court in October to consider whether the IRS has any role in determining whether a taxpayer has violated anti-drug laws. The U.S. solicitor general's office has not yet responded to the petition.
The Justice Department's court filing is posted below:
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Practice Leaders 'Bullish' That Second Trump Presidency Will Be Good for Business
3 minute readWhere May Vacancies for Trump Arise? These GOP-Appointed Circuit Judges Qualify for Senior Status
Big Law Leaders, Dealmakers Optimistic About M&A Deal Flow Under Trump, With Caveats
5 minute readWho Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250