Led by Jenner & Block, Microsoft, Princeton Join Forces in DACA Fight
It's the most recent lawsuit against the Trump administration over the decision to end the DACA program.
November 03, 2017 at 05:10 PM
9 minute read
Microsoft and Princeton University teamed up to file a lawsuit Friday in federal court challenging the Trump administration's decision to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.
The company and university, along with a current DACA recipient and Princeton student named Maria De La Cruz Perales Sanchez, are represented by Jenner & Block partner Tom Perrelli, who served as associate attorney general during President Barack Obama's first term. While the business community has largely come out in support of other lawsuits challenging the decision, Microsoft appears to be the first corporation to bring its own challenge against the Sept. 5 announcement. The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
“The termination of the DACA program severely harms Perales Sanchez and other
Dreamers, as well as the employers and educational institutions that rely on and benefit from their contributions,” the complaint said.
In the complaint, Microsoft said it has a “significant interest” in retaining the DACA recipients it employs, because of the high cost of recruiting talented employees and the disruptive nature of “unanticipated” employee turnover. Princeton likewise said it has an interest in maintaining the DACA program because it has already invested resources in students that receive DACA benefits on the assumption they would be allowed to continue studying and working in the country.
“Because fostering a diversity of perspectives is crucial to Princeton's mission of teaching and research and to Microsoft's core business functions, these two institutions have invested in many initiatives to make their campus and workplaces more welcoming to people of all backgrounds. DACA recipients are no exception,” according to the complaint.
The lawsuit asks the court to issue an injunction barring the government from enforcing the rescission. It alleges violations of the Administrative Procedure Act, as well as the Fifth Amendment's equal protection and due process clauses.
In an email, Justice Department spokesman Devin O'Malley said the government is eager to defend its decision.
“As the attorney general has said: 'No greater good can be done for the overall health and well-being of our Republic, than preserving and strengthening the impartial rule of law,'” O'Malley said. “While the plaintiffs in today's lawsuit may believe that an arbitrary circumvention of Congress is lawful, the Department of Justice looks forward to defending this administration's position.”
On Wednesday, Microsoft joined more than 100 other companies, including Uber Technologies Inc., Twitter Inc., Google and Facebook Inc., in filing an amicus brief in the University of California's challenge to the decision in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
In filing the lawsuit Friday, Microsoft followed through on its September promise to protect its employees affected by the decision. In a blog post that month, Brad Smith, Microsoft president and chief legal officer, wrote that if Congress did not act to protect the DACA program, “our company will exercise its legal rights properly to help protect our employees.”
The company and university, along with a current DACA recipient and Princeton student named Maria De La Cruz Perales Sanchez, are represented by
“The termination of the DACA program severely harms Perales Sanchez and other
Dreamers, as well as the employers and educational institutions that rely on and benefit from their contributions,” the complaint said.
In the complaint,
“Because fostering a diversity of perspectives is crucial to Princeton's mission of teaching and research and to
The lawsuit asks the court to issue an injunction barring the government from enforcing the rescission. It alleges violations of the Administrative Procedure Act, as well as the Fifth Amendment's equal protection and due process clauses.
In an email, Justice Department spokesman Devin O'Malley said the government is eager to defend its decision.
“As the attorney general has said: 'No greater good can be done for the overall health and well-being of our Republic, than preserving and strengthening the impartial rule of law,'” O'Malley said. “While the plaintiffs in today's lawsuit may believe that an arbitrary circumvention of Congress is lawful, the Department of Justice looks forward to defending this administration's position.”
On Wednesday,
In filing the lawsuit Friday,
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllQuinn Emanuel Files Countersuit Against DOJ in Row Over Premerger Reporting
3 minute read'Thoughtful Jurist': Maryland US District Senior Judge Messitte Dies After Short Illness
4 minute read'Religious Discrimination'?: 4th Circuit Revives Challenge to Employer Vaccine Mandate
2 minute read4th Circuit Revives Racial Harassment Lawsuit Against North Carolina School District
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Newsmakers: Former Pioneer Natural Resources Counsel Joins Bracewell’s Dallas Office
- 2Quiet Retirement Meets Resounding Win: Quinn Emanuel Name Partner Kathleen Sullivan's Vimeo Victory
- 3Avoiding the Great Gen AI Wrecking Ball: Ignore AI’s Transformative Power at Your Own Risk
- 4A Lesson on the Value of Good Neighbors Amid the Tragedy of the LA Fires
- 5Change Is Coming in the Trump Era. For Big Law, Change Is Already Here
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250