Facebook, Google and Twitter Spend Millions Lobbying as Russia Scrutiny Builds
Facebook, Google and Twitter spent a combined $7.14 million on lobbying in the three months ending Sept. 30,
October 23, 2017 at 12:45 PM
10 minute read
Facebook, Google and Twitter spent a combined $7.14 million on lobbying in the three months ending Sept. 30, according to new disclosures that capture how the companies are responding to greater regulatory scrutiny on Capitol Hill and beyond.
The companies have never more been in the spotlight than now, as U.S. lawmakers investigate how social media and web platforms helped Russia interfere with last year's presidential election. Top in-house lawyers for the companies are expected to testify Nov. 1 in Washington amid the congressional probe of Russia's meddling in the election.
The lobbying spend comes as the tech industry faces not just the reputational fallout of complicity with Russia's influence campaign but also the potential for regulatory reforms that would confront online advertising models.
Facebook GC Colin StretchGoogle led the tech industry trio, spending $4.17 million on a host of topics, including online advertising, one issue that's in focus in the Russia investigation. That amount was only the 10th-highest total in Google's history lobbying on Capitol Hill, according to a review of the company's disclosures. But it indicated the tech giant was getting out ahead of federal interest to craft new regulations for web advertising.
This month, U.S. Sens. John McCain, R-Arizona, Amy Klobuchar, D-Minnesota, and Mark Warner, D-Virginia, proposed legislation that would force Google, Facebook and other companies to disclose who is purchasing online political advertising.
Facebook spent $2.85 million in the third quarter—a total topped only by the $3.21 million the social media giant shelled out in the first three months of 2017.
As it has done in the past, the company leaned on its in-house lobbyists on the issue of online advertising. But it also deployed its policy team toward major national issues such as immigration reform. According to its disclosure, Facebook's team weighed in on “temporary high-tech worker visas and employment-based permanent residency” and pushed to restore the Obama-era policy of protecting undocumented immigrants who were brought to the United States as minors from deportation.
Google and Facebook, along with nearly two dozen other companies, are planning to launch a coalition to advocate for legislation allowing young, undocumented immigrants a path to permanent residency, according to Reuters.
The law firm Perkins Coie has guided Google and Facebook through regulatory issues arising out of the scrutiny over Russia-linked online ads, The New York Times reported last week. Marc Elias, a former Hillary Clinton adviser who leads the firm's political law practice, has helped the two tech giants request exemptions from Federal Election Commission's disclosure rules, contending that disclaimers would not fit in the ads posted on their respective platforms.
Twitter, traditionally a modest spender in Washington, also trained its sights on immigration, the company's lobbying disclosures show. The company spent part of its $120,000 third-quarter lobbying dollars to weigh in on President Donald Trump's executive order restricting travel to the United States. Two federal judges have enjoined parts of the latest order from taking effect.
Like Facebook and Google, Twitter also revealed its attention to a bipartisan bill proposed by U.S. Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, that seeks to hold websites accountable for knowingly providing a platform for sex traffickers. The bill is a response to outrage over Backpage.com, an online advertising site whose chief executive was charged last year with running what the California Attorney General's Office described as an “online brothel.”
While certainly opposed to sex trafficking, the wider tech industry has argued against a push to revise the Communications Decency Act that would end a shield that blocks holding internet companies liable to content posted by users.
Facebook,
The companies have never more been in the spotlight than now, as U.S. lawmakers investigate how social media and web platforms helped Russia interfere with last year's presidential election. Top in-house lawyers for the companies are expected to testify Nov. 1 in Washington amid the congressional probe of Russia's meddling in the election.
The lobbying spend comes as the tech industry faces not just the reputational fallout of complicity with Russia's influence campaign but also the potential for regulatory reforms that would confront online advertising models.
Facebook GC Colin StretchThis month, U.S. Sens. John McCain, R-Arizona, Amy Klobuchar, D-Minnesota, and Mark Warner, D-Virginia, proposed legislation that would force
Facebook spent $2.85 million in the third quarter—a total topped only by the $3.21 million the social media giant shelled out in the first three months of 2017.
As it has done in the past, the company leaned on its in-house lobbyists on the issue of online advertising. But it also deployed its policy team toward major national issues such as immigration reform. According to its disclosure, Facebook's team weighed in on “temporary high-tech worker visas and employment-based permanent residency” and pushed to restore the Obama-era policy of protecting undocumented immigrants who were brought to the United States as minors from deportation.
The law firm
Twitter, traditionally a modest spender in Washington, also trained its sights on immigration, the company's lobbying disclosures show. The company spent part of its $120,000 third-quarter lobbying dollars to weigh in on President Donald Trump's executive order restricting travel to the United States. Two federal judges have enjoined parts of the latest order from taking effect.
Like Facebook and
While certainly opposed to sex trafficking, the wider tech industry has argued against a push to revise the Communications Decency Act that would end a shield that blocks holding internet companies liable to content posted by users.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCan Law Firms Avoid Landing on 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readMeet the Pacific Northwest Judges Who Rejected the Kroger-Albertsons Supermarket Merger
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250