Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Last month we reported that Paul Ceglia, the indefatigable, indicted Buffalo businessman who claims to own half of Facebook Inc., might soon reveal the latest "nationally recognized" law firm willing to take his case. Ceglia showed he wasn’t just bluffing on Monday, when prominent California plaintiffs lawyer Joseph M. Alioto made an appearance on his behalf.

"I looked at the case and I looked at the evidence," Alioto told us Monday. "I think that [Ceglia] has a strong case. I think [his claims] follow a pattern that Mark Zuckerberg has had in the past with regard to people who have tried to help him."

Alioto isn’t the first big name to represent Ceglia, or the second or the third. DLA Piper, Milberg, Connor & Vilardo, Calihan Law, Jones & Skivington, Lippes Mathias Wexler Friedman, and San Diego attorney Jeffrey Lake have all entered and subsequently exited the case on Ceglia’s behalf at some point during the three-year litigation.

Lawyer Paul Argentieri of Hornell, New York, who filed Ceglia’s July 2010 complaint in U.S. district court in Buffalo, has been a mainstay of Ceglia’s legal team. Dean Boland of Boland Legal in Lakewood, Ohio has been on the case for the long haul too, but that’s not by choice. His motion to withdraw from the case was denied in late March.

Alioto enters the dispute just over a month after a magistrate judge recommended dismissing Ceglia’s lawsuit on the grounds that the contract at the heart of the case is fake. Ceglia also faces criminal charges related to his claims in the civil case: An indictment filed in October accused him of fabricating and destroying evidence.

But on Monday San Francisco-based Alioto was optimistic about his client’s chances. "We plan to ask for an injunction of the criminal indictment," Alioto said. "The government has a lot of important cases to bring and this is not one of them." As for the civil case, Alioto said he hopes the judge will be swayed by his team’s objections to the magistrate judge’s March 26 recommendation. "We think the magistrate judge usurped the function of jury under the Seventh Amendment."

Orin Snyder of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, who represents Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook, didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

This premium content is locked for
Litigation Daily subscribers only.

  • Subscribe now to enjoy unlimited access to Litigation Daily content,
  • 5 free articles* across the ALM Network every 30 days,
  • Exclusive access to other free ALM publications
  • And exclusive discounts on ALM events and publications.

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?
Interested in customizing your subscription with Law.com All Access?
Contact our Sales Professionals at 1-855-808-4530 or send an email to groupsales@alm.com to learn more.

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2017 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.