Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Ted Lavender and David Newdorf. Ted Lavender, left, and David Newdorf, right.

The Georgia Supreme Court on Thursday took up a question that lower courts have answered uniformly, albeit with no small degree of frustration: Does the state’s bar on “wrongful birth” claims leave no recourse for parents who bought sperm from a highly touted donor later revealed to have mental issues and a criminal record.

This premium content is locked for
Litigation Daily subscribers only.

Already have an account?
Interested in customizing your subscription with Law.com access?
Contact our Sales Professionals at 1-855-808-4530 or send an email
to groupsales@alm.com to learn more.

Law Firms Mentioned


Drug and Medical Device Product Liability DeskbookBook

FDA-regulated products now account for an estimated one-fifth of overall economic activity in the U.S. They have also been the focus of a litigation explosion. T...

Get More Information

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.