U.S. Patent Trademark Office. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
Trading Technologies Inc. argues that patents it obtained before the America Invents Act shouldn't be subject to cancellation without just compensation.
February 11, 2019 at 11:31 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Nationallawjournal/nationallawjournal
When the Patent and Trademark Office cancels patents in America Invents Act proceedings, is that an unconstitutional taking of property without compensation?
The U.S. Supreme Court described it as an open question last year, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit didn’t sound eager to run with it during arguments last week.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
