Daily Dicta: In Meningitis Pharmacy Case, 11 Guilty and One Acquittal—How McDermott Lawyers Won Their Case
“Representing an innocent person,” said McDermott Will & Emery partner Mark Pearlstein, “is the most pressure of all for a defense attorney.” And his client, pharmacist Joseph Matthew “Matt” Evanosky, was “absolutely innocent."
December 17, 2018 at 03:40 PM
7 minute read
“Representing an innocent person,” said McDermott Will & Emery partner Mark Pearlstein, “is the most pressure of all for a defense attorney.”
And pharmacist Joseph Matthew “Matt” Evanosky was “absolutely innocent,” Pearlstein said, wrongly caught up when the feds indicted 14 people in connection with the New England Compounding Center. In 2012, more than 100 people died and about 700 were sickened in a nationwide fungal meningitis outbreak linked to contaminated drugs from the pharmacy.
After a seven-week trial, a federal jury in Boston last week acquitted Evanosky while finding his five co-defendants guilty on a range of charges including racketeering, mail fraud and conspiring to defraud the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (None of the defendants in this trial were accused of making the specific drugs that harmed people.)
To date, 11 people connected to the pharmacy have been convicted or pleaded guilty. Evanosky is the lone acquittal.
The jury's not guilty verdict was “a reminder of why I decided to become a lawyer in the first place, and why I became a defense attorney,” said Pearlstein, who previously headed McDermott's Boston office and Boston trial practice, and is a member of the firm's management committee.
According to the FDA, the pharmacy failed to properly sterilize equipment, used expired ingredients in compounding medications and “routinely ignored mold and bacteria found inside the clean rooms” to maximize production and profits. As a result, hundreds of patients with who received injections of NECC's methylprednisolone acetate, which is used to treat pain and inflammation, developed life-threatening fungal meningitis.
A Criminal Justice Act panel member, Pearlstein was appointed by the court to represent Evanosky three years ago. Partner Dana M. McSherry and associate Jennifer Aronoff (who relocated from Chicago for the trial) rounded out the team. The firm opted not to seek reimbursement under the CJA for any attorney fees, handling the matter on a pro bono basis.
Pearlstein knew up front it would be a significant time commitment. “It was clear there was going to be a trial. There was never a plea possibility,” he said. “But I love trying cases.” Plus the trial provided an opportunity for Aronoff to get in-court experience, cross-examining several witnesses on the stand.
With six co-defendants, the proceedings were cumbersome, but Pearlstein said the defense counsel “got to know and trust one another… We were very focused on trying to coordinate our positions while still vigorously representing our individual clients.”
The other defendants were represented by lawyers from firms including Greenberg Traurig; Holland & Knight; Jackson Lewis; Clements & Pineault and Cunha & Holcomb.
So how did Pearlstein win acquittal for Evanosky?
“One feature that was important is that unlike the other pharmacists in the case, his job responsibilities were a little more limited,” Pearlstein said.
Evanosky handled each step in the process of making drugs for intrathecal pumps—medication delivered via an implanted pump to treat pain. “Essentially he was working on his own,” Pearlstein said, and the government never raised any issues related to the pumps.
Nor was he particularly well paid—he was hired in the spring of 2011 when he was about 39 years old, and made $68,000 that year. In 2012, he earned $84,000 until the pharmacy was shut down. He got no bonus or profit sharing, and was not paid extra for churning out more drugs.
By contrast, the New England Compounding Center owners made millions in profits.
“Why would a person who had otherwise led a blameless life suddenly become a criminal to benefit owners he hardly knew?” Pearlstein said.
The jury was convinced, finding Evanosky not guilty of all charges—racketeering, mail fraud and introduction of adulterated drugs into interstate commerce with intent to defraud.
“At the end of the day, what I'll remember always is walking into the hallway after the verdict, and [Evanosky's] wife came up to me and hugged me and thanked me for saving their lives,” Pearlstein said. “A moment like that, there's no price you can put on it.”
Officers cleared not only the room, but the entire fifth floor, where Friday's proceedings were held. For over an hour, a U.S. marshal declined to let reporters pass through the hall, and the court gave no indication as to how long the hearing would last.
When Kentucky's court of last resort reinstated a $100 million verdict against Chicago-based Grant Thornton, the world's sixth-largest accounting firm, it was more as a deterrent against future misconduct than out of sympathy for the wealthy plaintiffs.
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher is asking the U.S. government to pay more than $800,000 in legal fees for a pro bono victory in the U.S. Supreme Court in June. But whether and how much the firm is paid will place new scrutiny of the government's changed position in the case at the high court.
Kozinski appeared on a Ninth Circuit brief alongside lawyers from Toberoff & Associates on behalf of the son of Pulitzer Prize-winning author Paul Zindel, who claims the filmmakers behind the Academy Award-winning film “The Shape of Water” ripped off multiple copyrighted elements from his father.
Attorneys in a class action suit against Harvey Weinstein say the former Hollywood mogul is improperly looking to mine the discovery process in Delaware federal court for information to discredit sexual assault claims against him in Manhattan federal court.
A plaintiffs firm suing over injuries caused by exploding e-cigarettes has asked a California judge to coordinate the cases in order to decide a jurisdictional challenge raised by LG, the alleged manufacturer of the lithium ion batteries at issue.
In case you missed it…
The Fresenius decision is likely to influence every deal in Delaware going forward, and earned Lewis Clayton the mantle of Litigator of the Week.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTravis Lenkner Returns to Burford Capital With an Eye on Future Growth Opportunities
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar With Saul' Part V: Strange Days of Trump Trial Culminate in Historic Verdict
1 minute readLegal Speak's 'Sidebar with Saul' Part IV: Deliberations Begin in First Trump Criminal Trial
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: The Recorder and Law.com's California Legal Awards 2025
- 2The Week in Data Dec. 13: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
- 3Antitrust Class Actions Against CVS, Other Pharmacy Benefit Managers Are Piling Up
- 4Judge Grinds NY's Cannabis Licensing Regime to a Halt Again
- 5On the Move and After Hours: Barclay Damon; VLJ; Barnes & Thornburg
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250