Lori Andrus, Andrus Anderson. Photo: John Disney/ ALM
An ex-associate who accused Steptoe & Johnson of inequitable pay based on gender has dropped her case in light of last month’s U.S. Supreme Court decision upholding arbitration agreements that bar class actions over employment matters.
June 04, 2018 at 05:18 PM
1 minute read
staff reporter
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
An ex-associate who accused Steptoe & Johnson of inequitable pay based on gender has dropped her case in light of last month’s U.S. Supreme Court decision upholding arbitration agreements that bar class actions over employment matters.
Ji-In Houck, who sued a year ago, stipulated to the dismissal of her case on May 31. She filed a demand for arbitration before JAMS in Los Angeles on June 1.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
